Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28778171›Full record

ArticleDiagnostic pathology2017

Gene expression profiling in uveal melanoma: technical reliability and correlation of molecular class with pathologic characteristics.

Kristen M Plasseraud, Jeff K Wilkinson, Kristen M Oelschlager, Trisha M Poteet, Robert W Cook, John F Stone, Federico A Monzon

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostic pathology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kristen M PlasseraudCastle Biosciences, Inc., 820 S. Friendswood Drive, Suite 201, Friendswood, TX, 77546, USA.
Jeff K WilkinsonCastle Biosciences Laboratory, 3737 N. 7th St, Suite 160, Phoenix, AZ, 85014, USA.
Kristen M OelschlagerCastle Biosciences Laboratory, 3737 N. 7th St, Suite 160, Phoenix, AZ, 85014, USA.
Trisha M PoteetCastle Biosciences Laboratory, 3737 N. 7th St, Suite 160, Phoenix, AZ, 85014, USA.
Robert W CookCastle Biosciences, Inc., 820 S. Friendswood Drive, Suite 201, Friendswood, TX, 77546, USA.
John F StoneCastle Biosciences Laboratory, 3737 N. 7th St, Suite 160, Phoenix, AZ, 85014, USA.
Federico A MonzonCastle Biosciences, Inc., 820 S. Friendswood Drive, Suite 201, Friendswood, TX, 77546, USA. fmonzon@castlebiosciences.com.
Friends United · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA 15-gene expression profile test has been clinically validated and is widely utilized in newly diagnosed uveal melanoma (UM) patients to assess metastatic potential of the tumor. As most patients are treated with eye-sparing radiotherapy, there is limited tumor tissue available for testing, and technical reliability and success of prognostic testing are critical. This study assessed the analytical performance of the 15-gene expression test for UM and the correlation of molecular class with pathologic characteristics.

methodsInter-assay, intra-assay, inter-instrument/operator, and inter-site experiments were conducted, and concordance of the 15-gene expression profile test results and associated discriminant scores for matched tumor samples were evaluated. Technical success was determined from de-identified clinical reports from January 2010 - May 2016. Pathologic characteristics of enucleated tumors were correlated with molecular class results.

resultsInter-assay concordance on 16 samples run on 3 consecutive days was 100%, and matched discriminant scores were strongly correlated (R

conclusionsThese results show that the 15-gene expression profile test for UM has robust, reproducible performance characteristics. The technical success rate during clinical testing remains as high as first reported during validation. As molecular testing becomes more prevalent for supporting precision medicine efforts, high technical success and reliability are key characteristics when testing such limited and precious samples. The performance of the 15-gene expression profile test in this study should provide confidence to physicians who use the test's molecular classification to inform patient management decisions.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorGene Expression ProfilingHumansMelanomaReproducibility of ResultsTranscriptomeUveal MelanomaUveal NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorAnalytic validityGene expression profilingPrognosisUveal melanoma

Identifiers

PMID28778171
PMCPMC5545042
OpenAlexW2743542866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.