Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28778158›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2017

A qualitative study describing nursing home nurses sensemaking to detect medication order discrepancies.

Amy Vogelsmeier, Ruth A Anderson, Allison Anbari, Lawrence Ganong, Amany Farag, MaryAnn Niemeyer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Amy VogelsmeierS314 Sinclair School of Nursing, Columbia, MO, 65211, USA. vogelsmeiera@missouri.edu.
Ruth A AndersonUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 2007 Carrington Hall, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7460, USA.
Allison AnbariMissouri State University, Professional Building 305, 901 S. National Ave, Springfield, MO, 65897, USA.
Lawrence GanongUniversity of Missouri Department of Human Development and Family Science, 405 Gentry Hall, Columbia, MO, 65211, USA.
Amany FaragUniversity of Iowa College of Nursing, 101 College of Nursing Building, 50 Newton Road, Iowa City, IA, 52242-1121, USA.
MaryAnn NiemeyerSinclair School of Nursing, Columbia, MO, 65211, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMedication reconciliation is a safety practice to identify medication order discrepancies when patients' transitions between settings. In nursing homes, registered nurses (RNs) and licensed practical nurses (LPNs), each group with different education preparation and scope of practice responsibilities, perform medication reconciliation. However, little is known about how they differ in practice when making sense of medication orders to detect discrepancies. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to describe differences in RN and LPN sensemaking when detecting discrepancies.

methodWe used a qualitative methodology in a study of 13 RNs and 13 LPNs working in 12 Midwestern United States nursing homes. We used both conventional content analysis and directed content analysis methods to analyze semi-structured interviews. Four resident transfer vignettes embedded with medication order discrepancies guided the interviews. Participants were asked to describe their roles with medication reconciliation and their rationale for identifying medication order discrepancies within the vignettes as well as to share their experiences of performing medication reconciliation. The analysis approach was guided by Weick's Sensemaking theory.

resultsRNs provided explicit stories of identifying medication order discrepancies as well as examples of clinical reasoning to assure medication order appropriateness whereas LPNs described comparing medication lists. RNs and LPNs both acknowledged competing demands, but when performing medication reconciliation, RNs were more concerned about accuracy and safety, whereas LPNs were more concerned about time.

conclusionsNursing home nurses, particularly RNs, are in an important position to identify discrepancies that could cause resident harm. Both RNs and LPNs are valuable assets to nursing home care and keeping residents safe, yet RNs offer a unique contribution to complex processes such as medication reconciliation. Nursing home leaders must acknowledge the differences in RN and LPN contributions and make certain nurses in the most qualified role are assigned to ensure residents remain safe.

Indexed as

Practice Patterns, Nurses'Attitude of Health PersonnelFemaleHumansLeadershipMaleMedication ReconciliationMidwestern United StatesNurse PractitionersNursesNurse's RoleNursing HomesPatient SafetyQualitative ResearchMedication reconciliationMedication safetyNursing homesSensemaking

Identifiers

PMID28778158
PMCPMC5545015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.