Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28777728›Full record

ArticleNeural computation2017

Rat Prefrontal Cortex Inactivations during Decision Making Are Explained by Bistable Attractor Dynamics.

Alex T Piet, Jeffrey C Erlich, Charles D Kopec, Carlos D Brody

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neural computation, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Encoding of 2D Self-Centered Plans and World-Centered Positions in the Rat Frontal Orienting Field.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Attractor and integrator networks in the brain.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. More than Just a "Motor": Recent Surprises from the Frontal Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2018
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alex T PietPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, U.S.A. alexpiet@gmail.com.
Jeffrey C ErlichNYU-ECNU Institute of Brain and Cognitive Science, New York University Shanghai, Shanghai 200122, China jerlich@erlichlab.org.
Charles D KopecPrinceton Neuroscience Institute and Department of Molecular Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, U.S.A. ckopec@princeton.edu.
Carlos D BrodyPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Department of Molecular Biology, and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, U.S.A. brody@princeton.edu.

Funding

NRSA Training Grant in Quantitative NeuroscienceT32MH065214 · NIMH · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI Nathaniel Douglass Daw, KENNETH A NORMAN · 2002 to 2026
$7.9M
NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH065214
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two-node attractor networks are flexible models for neural activity during decision making. Depending on the network configuration, these networks can model distinct aspects of decisions including evidence integration, evidence categorization, and decision memory. Here, we use attractor networks to model recent causal perturbations of the frontal orienting fields (FOF) in rat cortex during a perceptual decision-making task (Erlich, Brunton, Duan, Hanks, & Brody, 2015 ). We focus on a striking feature of the perturbation results. Pharmacological silencing of the FOF resulted in a stimulus-independent bias. We fit several models to test whether integration, categorization, or decision memory could account for this bias and found that only the memory configuration successfully accounts for it. This memory model naturally accounts for optogenetic perturbations of FOF in the same task and correctly predicts a memory-duration-dependent deficit caused by silencing FOF in a different task. Our results provide mechanistic support for a "postcategorization" memory role of the FOF in upcoming choices.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalAnimalsComputer SimulationDecision MakingFunctional LateralityGABA-A Receptor AgonistsMemoryModels, PsychologicalMuscimolNeural Networks, ComputerPrefrontal CortexPsychometricsRatsTime FactorsGABA-A Receptor AgonistsMuscimol

Identifiers

PMID28777728
PMCPMC6535097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.