ArticleNeuroreport2017
Persistence of parenchymal and perivascular T-cells in treatment-refractory anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor encephalitis.
Article in Neuroreport, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- AMPAR immunization induces progressive autoimmune encephalitis with autoreactive B cells in the brain.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Meningeal and infiltrating T-cells are associated with repetitive head trauma and tau-mediated neurodegeneration in chronic traumatic encephalopathy.Acta neuropathologica communications · 2026Article
- Acute neuronal cell death and neuroinflammation per se do not trigger secondary autoimmune encephalitis in mice.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Autoimmune encephalitis-associated epilepsy.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2025Review
- Concurrent Tuberculous Meningoencephalitis and Anti-NMDAR Encephalitis: A Case Report.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Article
- Innate Immunity in the Central Nervous System: A Missing Piece of the Autoimmune Encephalitis Puzzle?Frontiers in immunology · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) encephalitis is an autoimmune disease mediated by IgG1 or IgG3 antibodies to the GluN1 subunit of the NMDAR, resulting in downregulation of NMDARs. Early diagnosis, prompt reduction of anti-NMDAR antibodies, and removal of associated ovarian tumors when identified are important drivers of prognosis. Immunohistochemical studies were carried out to evaluate B cell, plasma cell, and T-cell infiltrates in the brain of a 3-year-old patient with anti-NMDAR encephalitis who failed to show improvement after plasma exchange and Rituximab treatment. Complement activation was evaluated by C4d staining. Plasma cells and B-cells were rarely detected in the brain. In contrast, persistent intraparenchymal infiltrates and perivascular CD3+ T cells and evidence of complement activation were detected. Activated microglia and microglial nodules were also detected in the frontal lobes and the basal ganglia. The role of T cells and complement activation should be investigated in patients who do not respond to plasma exchange and Rituximab treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.