ReviewActa crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology2017
An overview of comparative modelling and resources dedicated to large-scale modelling of genome sequences.
Review in Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cafestol-derivatives as potential FXR agonists and CYP7A1 inhibitors and their impact on hypercholesterolemia: an in silico study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A Comprehensive Review on Homology Modelling in Drug Development: Methodologies, Tools, and Evaluation.Mini reviews in medicinal chemistry · 2026Review
- The structure assessment web server: for proteins, complexes and more.Nucleic acids research · 2024Article
- Influence of Model Structures on Predictors of Protein Stability Changes from Single-Point Mutations.Genes · 2023Article
- Mathematical and Machine Learning Approaches for Classification of Protein Secondary Structure Elements fromBiomolecules · 2023Article
- Structural and energetic analyses of SARS-CoV-2Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022Article
- Proteomics and Interspecies Interaction Analysis Revealed Abscisic Acid Signalling to Be the Primary Driver for Oil Palm's Response against Red Palm Weevil Infestation.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Protein Structure Prediction: Conventional and Deep Learning Perspectives.The protein journal · 2021Review
- Article
- Article
- Structure of the complete, membrane-assembled COPII coat reveals a complex interaction network.Nature communications · 2021Article
- Biological impact of mutually exclusive exon switching.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- Molecular Modeling and Bioinformatics Analysis of Drug-Receptor Interactions in the System Formed by Glargine, Its Metabolite M1, the Insulin Receptor, and the IGF1 Receptor.Bioinformatics and biology insights · 2021Article
- Statistical and molecular dynamics (MD) simulation approach to investigate the role of intrinsically disordered regions of shikimate dehydrogenase in microorganisms surviving at different temperatures.Extremophiles : life under extreme conditions · 2020Article
- SARS-CoV-2 spike protein predicted to form complexes with host receptor protein orthologues from a broad range of mammals.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Structural Biology in the Multi-Omics Era.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2020Article
- Design of a Peptide-Carrier Vaccine Based on the Highly Immunogenic Fasciola hepatica Leucine Aminopeptidase.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2020Article
- Homology modeling in the time of collective and artificial intelligence.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2020Review
- DockNmine, a Web Portal to Assemble and Analyse Virtual and Experimental Interaction Data.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Article
- VoroMQA web server for assessing three-dimensional structures of proteins and protein complexes.Nucleic acids research · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Computational modelling of proteins has been a major catalyst in structural biology. Bioinformatics groups have exploited the repositories of known structures to predict high-quality structural models with high efficiency at low cost. This article provides an overview of comparative modelling, reviews recent developments and describes resources dedicated to large-scale comparative modelling of genome sequences. The value of subclustering protein domain superfamilies to guide the template-selection process is investigated. Some recent cases in which structural modelling has aided experimental work to determine very large macromolecular complexes are also cited.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.