Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28776547›Full record

ArticleChinese medical journal2017

A Retrospective Survival Analysis of Anatomic and Prognostic Stage Group Based on the American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th Edition Cancer Staging Manual in Luminal B Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-negative Breast Cancer.

Ling Xu, Jiang-Hong Li, Jing-Ming Ye, Xue-Ning Duan, Yuan-Jia Cheng, Ling Xin, Qian Liu, Bin Zhou, Yin-Hua Liu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chinese medical journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Clinicopathological analysis of early-stage breast cancer patients that meet indications forChinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Liquid Biopsy in Oral Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ling XuBreast Disease Center, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing 100034, China.
Jiang-Hong LiDepartment of General Surgery, The Third Hospital of Shijiazhuang, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050011, China.
Jing-Ming YeBreast Disease Center, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing 100034, China.
Xue-Ning DuanBreast Disease Center, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing 100034, China.
Yuan-Jia ChengBreast Disease Center, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing 100034, China.
Ling XinBreast Disease Center, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing 100034, China.
Qian LiuBreast Disease Center, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing 100034, China.
Bin ZhouBreast Disease Center, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing 100034, China.
Yin-Hua LiuBreast Disease Center, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing 100034, China.
Peking University · CNPeking University First Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrent understanding of tumor biology suggests that breast cancer is a group of diseases with different intrinsic molecular subtypes. Anatomic staging system alone is insufficient to provide future outcome information. The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) expert panel updated the 8th edition of the staging manual with prognostic stage groups by incorporating biomarkers into the anatomic stage groups. In this study, we retrospectively analyzed the data from our center in China using the anatomic and prognostic staging system based on the AJCC 8th edition staging manual.

methodsWe reviewed the data from January 2008 to December 2014 for cases with Luminal B Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancer in our center. All cases were restaged using the AJCC 8th edition anatomic and prognostic staging system. The Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used to compare the survival differences between different subgroups. SPSS software version 19.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) was used for the statistical analyses.

resultsThis study consisted of 796 patients with Luminal B HER-negative breast cancer. The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) of 769 Stage I-III patients was 89.7%, and the 5-year overall survival (OS) of all 796 patients was 91.7%. Both 5-year DFS and 5-year OS were significantly different in the different anatomic and prognostic stage groups. There were 372 cases (46.7%) assigned to a different group. The prognostic Stage II and III patients restaged from anatomic Stage III had significant differences in 5-year DFS (χ2 = 11.319, P= 0.001) and 5-year OS (χ2 = 5.225, P= 0.022). In addition, cases restaged as prognostic Stage I, II, or III from the anatomic Stage II group had statistically significant differences in 5-year DFS (χ2 = 6.510, P= 0.039) but no significant differences in 5-year OS (χ2 = 5.087, P= 0.079). However, the restaged prognostic Stage I and II cases from anatomic Stage I had no statistically significant differences in either 5-year DFS (χ2 = 0.440, P= 0.507) or 5-year OS (χ2 = 1.530, P= 0.216).

conclusionsThe prognostic staging system proposed in the AJCC 8th edition refines the anatomic stage group in Luminal B HER2-negative breast cancer and will lead to a more personalized approach to breast cancer treatment.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkersBreast NeoplasmsDisease-Free SurvivalErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPrognosisRetrospective StudiesYoung AdultBiomarkersERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine Kinases

Identifiers

PMID28776547
PMCPMC5555129
OpenAlexW2741593473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.