Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28776163›Full record

SynthesisInfection2017

Characteristics of meningitis following transsphenoidal endoscopic surgery: a case series and a systematic literature review.

Pasquale Pagliano, Chiara Caggiano, Tiziana Ascione, Domenico Solari, Giusy Di Flumeri, Luigi Maria Cavallo, Fabio Tortora, Paolo Cappabianca

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Infection, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Multidisciplinary management of acromegaly: A consensus.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2020
    Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Pasquale PaglianoDepartment of Infectious Diseases, D. Cotugno Hospital, AORN dei Colli, Naples, Italy. ppagliano@libero.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8109-0655
Chiara CaggianoDivision of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine and Surgery, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Tiziana AscioneDepartment of Infectious Diseases, D. Cotugno Hospital, AORN dei Colli, Naples, Italy.
Domenico SolariDivision of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine and Surgery, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Giusy Di FlumeriDepartment of Infectious Diseases, D. Cotugno Hospital, AORN dei Colli, Naples, Italy.
Luigi Maria CavalloDivision of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine and Surgery, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Fabio TortoraCentro Traumatologico Ortopedico, Second University of Naples, Dipartimento Medico-Chirurgico di Internistica Clinica e Sperimentale "F. Magrassi e A. Lanzara", Naples, Italy.
Paolo CappabiancaDivision of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine and Surgery, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Naples, Italy.
University of Naples Federico II · ITOspedale D. Cotugno · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMeningitis occurs in 0.8-1.5% of patients undergoing neurosurgery. The aim of the study was to evaluate the characteristics of meningitis after endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery (EETS) comparing the findings retrieved to those highlighted by literature search. MATERIALS AND

methodsPatients treated by EETS during an 18-year period in the Department of Neurosurgery of 'Federico II' University of Naples were evaluated and included in the study if they fulfilled criteria for meningitis. Epidemiological, demographic, laboratory, and microbiological findings were evaluated. A literature research according to PRISMA methodology completed the study.

resultsEETS was performed on 1450 patients, 8 of them (0.6%) had meningitis [median age 46 years (range 33-73)]. Endoscopic surgery was performed 1-15 days (median 4 days) before diagnosis. Meningeal signs were always present. CSF examination revealed elevated cells [median 501 cells/μL (range 30-5728)], high protein [median 445 mg/dL (range 230-1210)], and low glucose [median 10 mg/dL (range 1-39)]. CSF culture revealed Gram-negative bacteria in four cases (Klebsiella pneumoniae, Escherichia coli, Alcaligenes spp., and Haemophilus influenzae), Streptococcus pneumoniae in two cases, Aspergillus fumigatus in one case. An abscess occupying the surgical site was observed in two cases. Six cases reported a favorable outcome; two died. Incidence of meningitis approached to 2%, as assessed by the literature search.

conclusionsIncidence of meningitis after EETS is low despite endoscope goes through non-sterile structures; microorganisms retrieved are those present within sinus microenvironment. Meningitis must be suspected in patients with persistent fever and impaired conscience status after EETS.

Indexed as

AdultAgedFemaleHumansIncidenceItalyMaleMeningitisMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsSphenoid BoneSphenoid SinusTreatment OutcomeAntibiotic treatmentMeningitisNeurosurgeryNosocomial infectionProphylaxisTranssphenoidal endoscopic surgery

Identifiers

PMID28776163
OpenAlexW2739825153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.