Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28776149›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2018

How do oncologists make decisions about chemotherapy for their older patients with cancer? A survey of Australian oncologists.

E B Moth, B E Kiely, V Naganathan, A Martin, P Blinman

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Development and Psychometric Validation of a Comprehensive Questionnaire to Assess Oncologists' Knowledge of Chemotherapy-Drug Interaction.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

E B MothConcord Cancer Centre, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Building 76, Hospital Rd, Concord, NSW, 2139, Australia.
B E KielyConcord Cancer Centre, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Building 76, Hospital Rd, Concord, NSW, 2139, Australia.
V NaganathanConcord Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
A MartinNHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
P BlinmanConcord Cancer Centre, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Building 76, Hospital Rd, Concord, NSW, 2139, Australia. prunella.blinman@sswahs.nsw.gov.au.ORCID 0000-0001-6251-0741
The University of Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeOncologists are making treatment decisions on increasing numbers of older patients with cancer. Due to comorbidities and frailty that increase with age, such decisions are often complex. We determined factors influencing oncologists' decisions to prescribe chemotherapy for older adults.

methodsMembers of the Medical Oncology Group of Australia (MOGA) were invited to complete an online survey in February to April 2016.

resultsNinety-three oncologists completed the survey of which 69 (74%) were consultants and 24 (26%) were trainees, with most (72, 77%) working predominantly in a public hospital-associated practice. The three highest ranked factors influencing decisions about (a) adjuvant chemotherapy were performance status, survival benefit of treatment, and life expectancy in the absence of cancer and about (b) palliative chemotherapy were performance status, patient preference, and quality of life. Most geriatric health domains are reportedly assessed routinely by the majority of respondents, though few routinely use geriatric screening tools (14%) or geriatric assessments (5%). In hypothetical patient scenarios, oncologists were less likely to prescribe palliative and adjuvant chemotherapy as age and rates of severe toxicity increased.

conclusionPerformance status was the most influential factor for oncologists when making a decision about chemotherapy for their older patients, and the importance of other factors differed according to treatment intent. Oncologists were less likely to recommend chemotherapy as patient age and treatment toxicity increased. The low uptake of geriatric assessments or screening tools provides scope for improved clinical assessment of older adults in treatment decision-making.

Indexed as

Decision MakingAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsAustraliaChemotherapy, AdjuvantFemaleGeriatric AssessmentHumansMaleMedical OncologyMiddle AgedNeoplasmsOncologistsPatient PreferenceChemotherapyDecision-makingElderlyOlder adultOncologist

Identifiers

PMID28776149
OpenAlexW2745016584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.