Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28776095›Full record

Observational studyGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2017

Treatment of age-related neovascular macular degeneration: the patient's perspective.

S Müller, C Ehlken, U Bauer-Steinhusen, W Lechtenfeld, Z Hasanbasic, H Agostini, T Wilke

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Systematic review: non-adherence and non-persistence in intravitreal treatment.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. nAMD: optimization of patient care and patient-oriented information with the help of an internet-based survey.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2022
    Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. [Adherence to anti-VEGF treatment-Considerations and practical recommendations].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. [IVOM quality assurance in Westfalen-Lippe : Structure of quality assurance and results of the pilot study Q-VERA].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2020
    Review
  19. Polysaccharide-Based Nanomaterials for Ocular Drug Delivery: A Perspective.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

S MüllerIPAM - Institute for Pharmacoeconomics and Medication Logistics, University of Wismar, Alter Holzhafen 19, 23966, Wismar, Germany. kontakt@ipam-wismar.de.
C EhlkenDepartment of Ophthalmology, Universitäts-Klinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Germany.
U Bauer-SteinhusenBayer Vital GmbH, Medical Affairs, Kaiser-Wilhelm-Allee 70, 51373, Leverkusen, Germany.
W LechtenfeldPRO RETINA Deutschland e.V, Vaalser Str. 108, 52074, Aachen, Germany.
Z HasanbasicBayer Vital GmbH, Medical Affairs, Kaiser-Wilhelm-Allee 70, 51373, Leverkusen, Germany.
H AgostiniEye Center, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Killianstraße 5, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
T WilkeIPAM - Institute for Pharmacoeconomics and Medication Logistics, University of Wismar, Alter Holzhafen 19, 23966, Wismar, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe aim of this study was to assess patients' views and expectations with regard to neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) and intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy (IVT).

methodsWe conducted a multicenter, non-interventional, prospective cohort study including nAMD patients treated with IVT in Germany. Patients with at least one IVT before study enrollment and aged ≥50 years were included. Three telephone interviews were conducted during a 12-month observational period. Here, patient's beliefs/expectations with regard to the nAMD disease and the IVT treatment were discussed. Only patients who completed all three phone interviews were included in the analyses. We used a two-step cluster analysis to identify patient clusters regarding specific patient attitudes towards nAMD and its treatment.

resultsThree hundred and thirty-two patients completed all interviews (mean age of 76.4 ± 7.2 years, 59.0% women). Out of these, 57.8% acknowledged that they needed general assistance in daily life, while 77.4% stated being able to attend general medical appointments on their own. However, 64.7% needed a driver or an accompanying person to attend their IVT appointments. In addition, 3.9% of the patients were afraid of IVT side effects. Also, 87.3% and 43.1% of the patients could name their disease or the anti-VEGF drug administered, respectively. More than three-quarters of the patients (83.1%) were aware of possible consequences of nAMD by stating vision loss or blindness, but only 16.6% knew that nAMD is a chronic disease. Generally, patients were optimistic: 70.2%, 5.1% and 13.0% of them expected stable visual acuity (VA), a significant improvement or expected worsening of VA in the next year, respectively. Almost two thirds of patients who provided their therapy expectations (47.0%) anticipated fewer injections/discontinuation of IVT. We identified five patient clusters differing significantly from each other with regard to four variables: being afraid of IVT, nAMD disease awareness, optimism with regard to effectiveness of IVT, and nAMD disease and treatment knowledge.

conclusionsOnly a minority of patients is aware of the chronic nature of nAMD. To motivate patients to accept a life-long IVT treatment, physicians and caregivers must know that there exist different patient types with significant differences in communication needs.

Indexed as

Visual AcuityAgedAged, 80 and overAngiogenesis InhibitorsBevacizumabFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIntravitreal InjectionsMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRanibizumabTime FactorsTomography, Optical CoherenceTreatment OutcomeAngiogenesis InhibitorsBevacizumabRanibizumabVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AAnti-VEGF therapyGermanyNeovascular age-related macular degenerationPatient perspectiveProspective non-interventional cohort study

Identifiers

PMID28776095
PMCPMC5640748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.