ArticleHeart and vessels2018
Determinants of survival and favorable neurologic outcomes in ischemic heart disease treated by veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.
Article in Heart and vessels, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation initiation timing and prognosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Pooled it
- Association between the Door-to-balloon Time and Mid-term Clinical Outcomes in Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan) · 2020Article
- Comparison of mid-term clinical outcomes after acute myocardial infarction in diabetic men between living alone and living together.Heart and vessels · 2019Article
- Determinants of short and long door-to-balloon time in current primary percutaneous coronary interventions.Heart and vessels · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Overall mortality and neurologic outcome of patients treated by veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-A ECMO) was still not satisfactory. The aim of this study was to clarify the determinants of survival and favorable neurologic outcomes in patients with ischemic heart disease (IHD) treated by V-A ECMO. We identified IHD patients who received V-A ECMO, and divided those patients into the survived and the in-hospital death group. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the determinants of survival and favorable neurologic outcomes. Fifty-eight patients were divided into the in-hospital death group (n = 35) and the survived group (n = 23). Cardiogenic arrest for the reason for V-A ECMO introduction (vs. non-cardiac arrest: OR 0.34, 95% CI 0.002-0.65, P = 0.03) and final thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI-3) flow grade (vs. TIMI ≤2 flow grade: OR 17.44, 95% CI 1.65-184.04, P = 0.02) were determinants of in-hospital survival. Time from collapse to initiation of V-A ECMO was inversely associated with favorable neurologic function (10 min increase; OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.28-0.89, P = 0.02), while final TIMI-3 flow grade was not associated with favorable neurologic function. In conclusion, the rapid establishment of V-A ECMO system as well as obtaining TIMI-3 flow grade should be sought for better survival with maintaining neurological function in IHD patients who requires V-A ECMO.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.