ArticlePublic health action2017
Ten tips to improve the visibility and dissemination of research for policy makers and practitioners.
Article in Public health action, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Are We There Yet? Co-Production in Recovery Colleges.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2025Article
- Connecting communities across the globe: Atlas protocol.Palliative care and social practice · 2025Article
- Online dissemination of Cochrane reviews on digital health technologies: a cross-sectional study.Systematic reviews · 2024Article
- Use of the Hashtag #DataSavesLives on Twitter: Exploratory and Thematic Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2022Article
- Twitter: More than Tweets for Undergraduate Student Researchers.Journal of microbiology & biology education · 2022Article
- Setting the Terms for Zoonotic Diseases: Effective Communication for Research, Conservation, and Public Policy.Viruses · 2021Article
- Improving knowledge translation for increased engagement and impact in healthcare.BMJ open quality · 2020Article
- Implementing physically active learning: Future directions for research, policy, and practice.Journal of sport and health science · 2020Article
- Centre for the Promotion of Physical Activity and Health (CAPAS-City): A Pyrenean Cross-Cultural Structure to Lead the Way in the Design, Implementation, and Evaluation of Multilevel Physical Activity Interventions.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019Article
- Getting the Word Out: New Approaches for Disseminating Public Health Science.Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMPArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Effective dissemination of evidence is important in bridging the gap between research and policy. In this paper, we list 10 approaches for improving the visibility of research findings, which in turn will hopefully contribute towards changes in policy. Current approaches include using social media (Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn); sharing podcasts and other research outputs such as conference papers, posters, presentations, reports, protocols, preprint copy and research data (figshare, Zenodo, Slideshare, Scribd); and using personal blogs and unique author identifiers (ORCID, ResearcherID). Researchers and funders could consider drawing up a systematic plan for dissemination of research during the stage of protocol development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.