ArticleJournal of clinical & cellular immunology2017
Rebound from Inhibition: Self-Correction against Neurodegeneration?
Article in Journal of clinical & cellular immunology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Ventral pallidum GABA and glutamate neurons drive approach and avoidance through distinct modulation of VTA cell types.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Unraveling the Neural Circuits: Techniques, Opportunities and Challenges in Epilepsy Research.Cellular and molecular neurobiology · 2024Review
- Post-Inhibitory Rebound Firing of Dorsal Root Ganglia Neurons.Journal of pain research · 2022Article
- Astrocyte Infection Is Required for Retrovirus-Induced Spongiform Neurodegeneration Despite Suppressed Viral Protein Expression.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Neural networks play a critical role in establishing constraints on excitability in the central nervous system. Several recent studies have suggested that network dysfunction in the brain and spinal cord are compromised following insult by a neurodegenerative trigger and might precede eventual neuronal loss and neurological impairment. Early intervention of network excitability and plasticity might therefore be critical in resetting hyperexcitability and preventing later neuronal damage. Here, the behavior of neurons that generate burst firing upon recovery from inhibitory input or intrinsic membrane hyperpolarization (rebound neurons) is examined in the context of neural networks that underlie rhythmic activity observed in areas of the brain and spinal cord that are vulnerable to neurodegeneration. In a non-inflammatory rodent model of spongiform neurodegenerative disease triggered by retrovirus infection of glia, rebound neurons are particularly vulnerable to neurodegeneration, likely due to an inherently low calcium buffering capacity. The dysfunction of rebound neurons translates into a dysfunction of rhythmic neural circuits, compromising normal neurological function and leading to eventual morbidity. Understanding how virus infection of glia can mediate dysfunction of rebound neurons, induce hyperexcitability and loss of rhythmic function, pathologic features observed in neurodegenerative disorders ranging from epilepsy to motor neuron disease, might therefore suggest a common pathway for early therapeutic intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.