Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28775744›Full record

ReviewThe Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale2017

The Role of Adjunctive Therapies in Septic Shock by Gram Negative MDR/XDR Infections.

Stefano Busani, Erika Roat, Giulia Serafini, Elena Mantovani, Emanuela Biagioni, Massimo Girardis

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Recent nanoengineered therapeutic advancements in sepsis management.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Stefano BusaniIntensive Care Unit, Modena University Hospital, L.go del Pozzo 71, 41100 Modena, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0150-4967
Erika RoatIntensive Care Unit, Modena University Hospital, L.go del Pozzo 71, 41100 Modena, Italy.
Giulia SerafiniIntensive Care Unit, Modena University Hospital, L.go del Pozzo 71, 41100 Modena, Italy.
Elena MantovaniIntensive Care Unit, Modena University Hospital, L.go del Pozzo 71, 41100 Modena, Italy.
Emanuela BiagioniIntensive Care Unit, Modena University Hospital, L.go del Pozzo 71, 41100 Modena, Italy.
Massimo GirardisIntensive Care Unit, Modena University Hospital, L.go del Pozzo 71, 41100 Modena, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2453-0829

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients with septic shock by multidrug resistant microorganisms (MDR) are a specific sepsis population with a high mortality risk. The exposure to an initial inappropriate empiric antibiotic therapy has been considered responsible for the increased mortality, although other factors such as immune-paralysis seem to play a pivotal role. Therefore, beyond conventional early antibiotic therapy and fluid resuscitation, this population may benefit from the use of alternative strategies aimed at supporting the immune system. In this review we present an overview of the relationship between MDR infections and immune response and focus on the rationale and the clinical data available on the possible adjunctive immunotherapies, including blood purification techniques and different pharmacological approaches.

Identifiers

PMID28775744
PMCPMC5523464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.