Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28775344›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Neuroscience2017

Neuronal cell-type classification: challenges, opportunities and the path forward.

Hongkui Zeng, Joshua R Sanes

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Neuroscience, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 471 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
471citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

471 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Multimodal analysis reveals cellular diversity and divergent circuits of the zona incerta.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. A Community Standard Multispecies Cell Atlas of the Basal Ganglia.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

411 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hongkui ZengAllen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, Washington, 98109, USA.
Joshua R SanesCenter for Brain Science and Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 02138, USA.

Funding

Establishing a Comprehensive and Standardized Cell Type Characterization PlatformU01MH105982 · NIMH · ALLEN INSTITUTE · PI ANDERSON, DAVID J, ZENG, HONGKUI · 2014 to 2016
$5.1M
High-throughput robotic analysis of integrated neuronal phenotypesR01EY023173 · NEI · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI BOYDEN, EDWARD S., FOREST, CRAIG · 2012 to 2016
$4.3M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY023173
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neurons have diverse molecular, morphological, connectional and functional properties. We believe that the only realistic way to manage this complexity - and thereby pave the way for understanding the structure, function and development of brain circuits - is to group neurons into types, which can then be analysed systematically and reproducibly. However, neuronal classification has been challenging both technically and conceptually. New high-throughput methods have created opportunities to address the technical challenges associated with neuronal classification by collecting comprehensive information about individual cells. Nonetheless, conceptual difficulties persist. Borrowing from the field of species taxonomy, we propose principles to be followed in the cell-type classification effort, including the incorporation of multiple, quantitative features as criteria, the use of discontinuous variation to define types and the creation of a hierarchical system to represent relationships between cells. We review the progress of classifying cell types in the retina and cerebral cortex and propose a staged approach for moving forward with a systematic cell-type classification in the nervous system.

Indexed as

AnimalsCerebral CortexHumansNeuronsRetina

Identifiers

PMID28775344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.