Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28775281›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Voxel-based analysis unveils regional dose differences associated with radiation-induced morbidity in head and neck cancer patients.

Serena Monti, Giuseppe Palma, Vittoria D'Avino, Marianna Gerardi, Giulia Marvaso, Delia Ciardo, Roberto Pacelli, Barbara A Jereczek-Fossa, Daniela Alterio, Laura Cella

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Serena MontiIRCCS SDN, Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8777-7837
Giuseppe PalmaInstitute of Biostructures and Bioimaging, National Research Council (CNR), Naples, Italy.
Vittoria D'AvinoInstitute of Biostructures and Bioimaging, National Research Council (CNR), Naples, Italy.
Marianna GerardiDepartment of Radiotherapy, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy.
Giulia MarvasoDepartment of Radiotherapy, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy.
Delia CiardoDepartment of Radiotherapy, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy.
Roberto PacelliDepartment of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, Federico II University School of Medicine, Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2048-7675
Barbara A Jereczek-FossaDepartment of Radiotherapy, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy.
Daniela AlterioDepartment of Radiotherapy, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy.
Laura CellaInstitute of Biostructures and Bioimaging, National Research Council (CNR), Naples, Italy. laura.cella@cnr.it.ORCID 0000-0003-0058-4029

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The risk of radiation-induced toxicity in patients treated for head and neck (HN) cancer with radiation therapy (RT) is traditionally estimated by condensing the 3D dose distribution into a monodimensional cumulative dose-volume histogram which disregards information on dose localization. We hypothesized that a voxel-based approach would identify correlations between radiation-induced morbidity and local dose release, thus providing a new insight into spatial signature of radiation sensitivity in composite regions like the HN district. This methodology was applied to a cohort of HN cancer patients treated with RT at risk of radiation-induced acute dysphagia (RIAD). We implemented an inter-patient elastic image registration framework that proved robust enough to match even the most elusive HN structures and to provide accurate dose warping. A voxel-based statistical analysis was then performed to test regional dosimetric differences between patients with and without RIAD. We identified a significantly higher dose delivered to RIAD patients in two voxel clusters in correspondence of the cricopharyngeus muscle and cervical esophagus. Our study goes beyond the well-established organ-based philosophy exploring the relationship between radiation-induced morbidity and local dose differences in the HN region. This approach is generally applicable to different HN toxicity endpoints and is not specific to RIAD.

Indexed as

Radiation DosageHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansRadiation InjuriesRadiation MonitoringRadiotherapyRadiotherapy, Image-GuidedRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID28775281
PMCPMC5543173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.