Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28774963›Full record

Trial reportBMJ supportive & palliative care2018

Integrating palliative care into neurology services: what do the professionals say?

Nilay Hepgul, Wei Gao, Catherine J Evans, Diana Jackson, Liesbeth M van Vliet, Anthony Byrne, Vincent Crosby, Karen E Groves, Fiona Lindsay, Irene J Higginson and 1 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ supportive & palliative care, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Palliative Care and Parkinson's Disease: Time to Move Beyond Cancer.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Nilay HepgulDepartment of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, Cicely Saunders Institute, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5980-1457
Wei GaoDepartment of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, Cicely Saunders Institute, King's College London, London, UK.
Catherine J EvansDepartment of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, Cicely Saunders Institute, King's College London, London, UK.
Diana JacksonDepartment of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, Cicely Saunders Institute, King's College London, London, UK.
Liesbeth M van VlietDepartment of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, Cicely Saunders Institute, King's College London, London, UK.
Anthony ByrneDepartment of Palliative Medicine, Cardiff & Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, UK.
Vincent CrosbyDepartment of Palliative Medicine, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Nottingham, UK.
Karen E GrovesQueenscourt Hospice, Liverpool, UK.
Fiona LindsayDepartment of Palliative Medicine, Sussex Community NHS Foundation Trust, Brighton, UK.
Irene J HigginsonDepartment of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, Cicely Saunders Institute, King's College London, London, UK.
OPTCARE Neuro

Funding

Department of Health 12/130/47Marie Curie MCCC-FCO-11-C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesEvaluations of new services for palliative care in non-cancer conditions are few. OPTCARE Neuro is a multicentre trial evaluating the effectiveness of short-term integrated palliative care (SIPC) for progressive long-term neurological conditions. Here, we present survey results describing the current levels of collaboration between neurology and palliative care services and exploring the views of professionals towards the new SIPC service.

methodsNeurology and palliative care teams from six UK trial sites (London, Nottingham, Liverpool, Cardiff, Brighton and Chertsey) were approached via email to complete an online survey. The survey was launched in July 2015 and consisted of multiple choice or open comment questions with responses collected using online forms.

results33 neurology and 26 palliative care professionals responded. Collaborations between the two specialties were reported as being 'good/excellent' by 36% of neurology and by 58% of palliative care professionals. However, nearly half (45%) of neurology compared with only 12% of palliative care professionals rated current levels as being 'poor/none'. Both professional groups felt that the new SIPC service would influence future collaborations for the better. However, they identified a number of barriers for the new SIPC service such as resources and clinician awareness.

conclusionsOur results demonstrate the opportunity to increase collaboration between neurology and palliative care services for people with progressive neurological conditions, and the acceptability of SIPC as a model to support this. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN18337380; Pre-results.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelHumansIntegrative MedicineIntersectoral CollaborationNeurologyPalliative CareSurveys and Questionnaireschronic conditionsclinical decisionscommunicationneurological conditions

Identifiers

PMID28774963
PMCPMC5879955

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.