ArticleCirculation. Cardiovascular imaging2017
Variation in the Echocardiographic Surveillance of Primary Mitral Regurgitation.
Article in Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Use of an ultrasound picture archiving and communication system to answer research questions: Description of data cleaning methods.Australasian journal of ultrasound in medicine · 2024Article
- Development and validation of an echocardiographic algorithm to predict long-term mitral and tricuspid regurgitation progression.European heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging · 2022Article
- Identification of Need for Ultrasound Enhancing Agent Study (the IN-USE Study).Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography · 2020Article
- Priorities for Patient-Centered Research in Valvular Heart Disease: A Report From the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Working Group.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2020Article
- Demonstrating the Value of Outcomes in Echocardiography: Imaging-Based Registries in Improving Patient Care.Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundClinical outcomes after surgical treatment of mitral regurgitation are worse if intervention occurs after deterioration of left ventricular size and function. Transthoracic echocardiographic (TTE) surveillance of patients with mitral regurgitation is indicated to avoid adverse ventricular remodeling. Overly frequent TTEs can impair patient access and reduce value in care delivery. This balance between timely surveillance and overutilization of TTE in valvular disease provides a model to study variation in the delivery of healthcare services. We investigated patient and provider factors contributing to variation in TTE utilization and hypothesized that variation was attributable to provider practice even after adjustment for patient characteristics. METHODS AND
resultsWe obtained records of all TTEs from 2001 to 2016 completed at a large echocardiography laboratory. The outcome variable was time interval between TTEs. We constructed a mixed-effects linear regression model with the individual physician as the random effect in the model and used intraclass correlation coefficient to assess the proportion of outcome variation because of provider practice. Our study cohort was 55 773 TTEs corresponding to 37 843 intervals ordered by 635 providers. The mean interval between TTEs was 12.4 months, 17.0 months, 18.3 months, and 17.4 months for severe, moderate, mild, and trace mitral regurgitation, respectively, with 20% of providers deemed overutilizers of TTEs and 25% underutilizers.
conclusionsWe conclude that there is substantial variation in follow-up intervals for TTE assessment of mitral regurgitation, despite risk-adjustment for patient variables, likely because of provider factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.