ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2017
Feature selection through validation and un-censoring of endovascular repair survival data for predicting the risk of re-intervention.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine Learning and Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: A New Paradigm in Prediction and Prognosis after Endovascular Aneurysm Repair.Annals of vascular diseases · 2026Review
- A lightweight deep learning framework for transformer fault diagnosis in smart grids using multiple scale CNN features.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Current Prognostic Biomarkers for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: A Comprehensive Scoping Review of the Literature.Biomolecules · 2024Article
- Color-CADx: a deep learning approach for colorectal cancer classification through triple convolutional neural networks and discrete cosine transform.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- A Framework for Lung and Colon Cancer Diagnosis via Lightweight Deep Learning Models and Transformation Methods.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- A wavelet-based deep learning pipeline for efficient COVID-19 diagnosis via CT slices.Applied soft computing · 2022Article
- An Intelligent ECG-Based Tool for Diagnosing COVID-19 via Ensemble Deep Learning Techniques.Biosensors · 2022Article
- ECG-BiCoNet: An ECG-based pipeline for COVID-19 diagnosis using Bi-Layers of deep features integration.Computers in biology and medicine · 2022Article
- DIAROP: Automated Deep Learning-Based Diagnostic Tool for Retinopathy of Prematurity.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Histo-CADx: duo cascaded fusion stages for breast cancer diagnosis from histopathological images.PeerJ. Computer science · 2021Article
- Intelligent Dermatologist Tool for Classifying Multiple Skin Cancer Subtypes by Incorporating Manifold Radiomics Features Categories.Contrast media & molecular imaging · 2021Article
- GASTRO-CADx: a three stages framework for diagnosing gastrointestinal diseases.PeerJ. Computer science · 2021Article
- CoMB-Deep: Composite Deep Learning-Based Pipeline for Classifying Childhood Medulloblastoma and Its Classes.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2021Article
- A BCI System Based on Motor Imagery for Assisting People with Motor Deficiencies in the Limbs.Brain sciences · 2020Article
- FUSI-CAD: Coronavirus (COVID-19) diagnosis based on the fusion of CNNs and handcrafted features.PeerJ. Computer science · 2020Article
- Breast Cancer Diagnosis Using an Efficient CAD System Based on Multiple Classifiers.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- A deep learning-based diagnostic tool for identifying various diseases via facial images.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFeature selection (FS) process is essential in the medical area as it reduces the effort and time needed for physicians to measure unnecessary features. Choosing useful variables is a difficult task with the presence of censoring which is the unique characteristic in survival analysis. Most survival FS methods depend on Cox's proportional hazard model; however, machine learning techniques (MLT) are preferred but not commonly used due to censoring. Techniques that have been proposed to adopt MLT to perform FS with survival data cannot be used with the high level of censoring. The researcher's previous publications proposed a technique to deal with the high level of censoring. It also used existing FS techniques to reduce dataset dimension. However, in this paper a new FS technique was proposed and combined with feature transformation and the proposed uncensoring approaches to select a reduced set of features and produce a stable predictive model.
methodsIn this paper, a FS technique based on artificial neural network (ANN) MLT is proposed to deal with highly censored Endovascular Aortic Repair (EVAR). Survival data EVAR datasets were collected during 2004 to 2010 from two vascular centers in order to produce a final stable model. They contain almost 91% of censored patients. The proposed approach used a wrapper FS method with ANN to select a reduced subset of features that predict the risk of EVAR re-intervention after 5 years to patients from two different centers located in the United Kingdom, to allow it to be potentially applied to cross-centers predictions. The proposed model is compared with the two popular FS techniques; Akaike and Bayesian information criteria (AIC, BIC) that are used with Cox's model.
resultsThe final model outperforms other methods in distinguishing the high and low risk groups; as they both have concordance index and estimated AUC better than the Cox's model based on AIC, BIC, Lasso, and SCAD approaches. These models have p-values lower than 0.05, meaning that patients with different risk groups can be separated significantly and those who would need re-intervention can be correctly predicted.
conclusionThe proposed approach will save time and effort made by physicians to collect unnecessary variables. The final reduced model was able to predict the long-term risk of aortic complications after EVAR. This predictive model can help clinicians decide patients' future observation plan.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.