Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28774329›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2017

Feature selection through validation and un-censoring of endovascular repair survival data for predicting the risk of re-intervention.

Omneya Attallah, Alan Karthikesalingam, Peter J E Holt, Matthew M Thompson, Rob Sayers, Matthew J Bown, Eddie C Choke, Xianghong Ma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Omneya AttallahSchool of Engineering and Applied Science, Aston University, B4 7ET, Birmingham, UK.
Alan KarthikesalingamSt George's Vascular Institute, London, SW17 0QT, UK.
Peter J E HoltSt George's Vascular Institute, London, SW17 0QT, UK.
Matthew M ThompsonSt George's Vascular Institute, London, SW17 0QT, UK.
Rob SayersSt George's Vascular Institute, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Blackshaw Road, London, SW17 0QT, UK.
Matthew J BownVascular Surgery Group, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Eddie C ChokeVascular Surgery Group, Robert Kilpatrick Clinical Sciences Building, Leicester Royal Infirmary, University of Leicester, Leicester, LE2 7LX, UK.
Xianghong MaSchool of Engineering and Applied Science, Aston University, B4 7ET, Birmingham, UK. x.ma@aston.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4957-2942

Funding

Department of Health NIHR-CS-011-008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFeature selection (FS) process is essential in the medical area as it reduces the effort and time needed for physicians to measure unnecessary features. Choosing useful variables is a difficult task with the presence of censoring which is the unique characteristic in survival analysis. Most survival FS methods depend on Cox's proportional hazard model; however, machine learning techniques (MLT) are preferred but not commonly used due to censoring. Techniques that have been proposed to adopt MLT to perform FS with survival data cannot be used with the high level of censoring. The researcher's previous publications proposed a technique to deal with the high level of censoring. It also used existing FS techniques to reduce dataset dimension. However, in this paper a new FS technique was proposed and combined with feature transformation and the proposed uncensoring approaches to select a reduced set of features and produce a stable predictive model.

methodsIn this paper, a FS technique based on artificial neural network (ANN) MLT is proposed to deal with highly censored Endovascular Aortic Repair (EVAR). Survival data EVAR datasets were collected during 2004 to 2010 from two vascular centers in order to produce a final stable model. They contain almost 91% of censored patients. The proposed approach used a wrapper FS method with ANN to select a reduced subset of features that predict the risk of EVAR re-intervention after 5 years to patients from two different centers located in the United Kingdom, to allow it to be potentially applied to cross-centers predictions. The proposed model is compared with the two popular FS techniques; Akaike and Bayesian information criteria (AIC, BIC) that are used with Cox's model.

resultsThe final model outperforms other methods in distinguishing the high and low risk groups; as they both have concordance index and estimated AUC better than the Cox's model based on AIC, BIC, Lasso, and SCAD approaches. These models have p-values lower than 0.05, meaning that patients with different risk groups can be separated significantly and those who would need re-intervention can be correctly predicted.

conclusionThe proposed approach will save time and effort made by physicians to collect unnecessary variables. The final reduced model was able to predict the long-term risk of aortic complications after EVAR. This predictive model can help clinicians decide patients' future observation plan.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsMachine LearningNeural Networks, ComputerSurvival AnalysisAortic AneurysmEndovascular ProceduresHumansPrognosisReoperationRiskCensoringCox’s hazard proportional modelEndovascular aortic aneurysm repairFactor analysisFeature selectionModel selectionSurvival analysis

Identifiers

PMID28774329
PMCPMC5543447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.