ReviewGlobalization and health2017
Policy experimentation and innovation as a response to complexity in China's management of health reforms.
Review in Globalization and health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of hospice and palliative care policies in China: a Theme-Instrument-Effectiveness (TIE) framework based on text analysis.BMC palliative care · 2026Article
- Developing supportive policy environments for hospice care in china: a quantitative policy evaluation based on the PMC-Index model.BMC palliative care · 2025Article
- Co-evolution of private and public hospitals: spatiotemporal disparities, geospatial interactions, and social determinants over 19 years in Sichuan, China.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- The effect of long-term care insurance on healthcare utilization of middle-aged and older adults: evidence from China health and retirement longitudinal study.International journal for equity in health · 2023Article
- Scaling-up through piloting: dual-track provider payment reforms in China's health system.Health policy and planning · 2023Article
- How has Guinea learnt from the response to outbreaks? A learning health system analysis.BMJ global health · 2023Article
- Deliberation-based learning: strengthening neonatal care in China.BMJ global health · 2022Article
- Seeking policy solutions in a complex system: experimentalist governance in China's healthcare reform.Policy sciences · 2022Article
- Digital health interventions for COVID-19 in China: a retrospective analysis.Intelligent medicine · 2021Article
- 'We had to manage what we had on hand, in whatever way we could': adaptive responses in policy for decentralized drug-resistant tuberculosis care in South Africa.Health policy and planning · 2021Article
- Turning points for sustainability transitions: Institutional destabilization, public finance and the techno-economic dynamics of decarbonization in South Africa.Energy research & social science · 2020Article
- Understanding China's growing involvement in global health and managing processes of change.Globalization and health · 2020Review
- Outpatients' Satisfaction in the Context of 10 Years of Health-Care Reform: A Cross-Sectional Study of Tertiary Hospitals in Shiyan, China.Patient preference and adherence · 2020Article
- Technical assistance: a practical account of the challenges in design and implementation.Gates open research · 2020Article
- The China-UK Global Health Support Programme: looking for new roles and partnerships in changing times.Global health research and policy · 2020Article
- Governance function analysis of the Patriotic Health Movement in China.Global health research and policy · 2019Review
- Evaluation and learning in complex, rapidly changing health systems: China's management of health sector reform.Globalization and health · 2018Review
- A third-party investigation of inpatient satisfaction with a tertiary hospital in People's Republic of China.Patient preference and adherence · 2018Article
- Non-communicable diseases control in China and Japan.Globalization and health · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There are increasing criticisms of dominant models for scaling up health systems in developing countries and a recognition that approaches are needed that better take into account the complexity of health interventions. Since Reform and Opening in the late 1970s, Chinese government has managed complex, rapid and intersecting reforms across many policy areas. As with reforms in other policy areas, reform of the health system has been through a process of trial and error. There is increasing understanding of the importance of policy experimentation and innovation in many of China's reforms; this article argues that these processes have been important in rebuilding China's health system. While China's current system still has many problems, progress is being made in developing a functioning system able to ensure broad population access. The article analyses Chinese thinking on policy experimentation and innovation and their use in management of complex reforms. It argues that China's management of reform allows space for policy tailoring and innovation by sub-national governments under a broad agreement over the ends of reform, and that shared understandings of policy innovation, alongside informational infrastructures for the systemic propagation and codification of useful practices, provide a framework for managing change in complex environments and under conditions of uncertainty in which 'what works' is not knowable in advance. The article situates China's use of experimentation and innovation in management of health system reform in relation to recent literature which applies complex systems thinking to global health, and concludes that there are lessons to be learnt from China's approaches to managing complexity in development of health systems for the benefit of the poor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.