Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28774307›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2017

Perspectives of policy and political decision makers on access to formal dementia care: expert interviews in eight European countries.

Anja Broda, Anja Bieber, Gabriele Meyer, Louise Hopper, Rachael Joyce, Kate Irving, Orazio Zanetti, Elisa Portolani, Liselot Kerpershoek, Frans Verhey and 12 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Anja BrodaMartin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Institute of Health and Nursing Sciences, Magdeburger Straße 8, D-06112, Halle (Saale), Germany. anja.broda@medizin.uni-halle.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2564-6521
Anja BieberMartin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Institute of Health and Nursing Sciences, Magdeburger Straße 8, D-06112, Halle (Saale), Germany.
Gabriele MeyerMartin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Institute of Health and Nursing Sciences, Magdeburger Straße 8, D-06112, Halle (Saale), Germany.
Louise HopperDublin City University, School of Nursing and Human Sciences, Dublin, Ireland.
Rachael JoyceDublin City University, School of Nursing and Human Sciences, Dublin, Ireland.
Kate IrvingDublin City University, School of Nursing and Human Sciences, Dublin, Ireland.
Orazio ZanettiIRCCS S. Giovanni di Dio "Fatebenefratelli", Brescia, Italy.
Elisa PortolaniIRCCS S. Giovanni di Dio "Fatebenefratelli", Brescia, Italy.
Liselot KerpershoekAlzheimer Center Limburg, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Frans VerheyAlzheimer Center Limburg, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Marjolein de VugtAlzheimer Center Limburg, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Claire WolfsAlzheimer Center Limburg, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Siren EriksenNorwegian National Advisory Unit on Ageing and Health, Vestfold Hospital Trust, Oslo, Norway.
Janne RøsvikNorwegian National Advisory Unit on Ageing and Health, Vestfold Hospital Trust, Oslo, Norway.
Maria J MarquesCEDOC, Chronic Diseases Research Center, Nova Medical School/Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Manuel Gonçalves-PereiraCEDOC, Chronic Diseases Research Center, Nova Medical School/Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Britt-Marie SjölundAging Research Center (ARC), Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society (NVS), Karolinska Institutet and Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Bob WoodsBangor University, Dementia Services Development Centre, Bangor, UK.
Hannah JelleyBangor University, Dementia Services Development Centre, Bangor, UK.
Martin OrrellNottingham University, Institute of Mental Health, Nottingham, UK.
Astrid StephanMartin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Institute of Health and Nursing Sciences, Magdeburger Straße 8, D-06112, Halle (Saale), Germany.
ActifCare Consortium

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs part of the ActifCare (ACcess to Timely Formal Care) project, we conducted expert interviews in eight European countries with policy and political decision makers, or representatives of relevant institutions, to determine their perspectives on access to formal care for people with dementia and their carers.

methodsEach ActifCare country (Germany, Ireland, Italy, The Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Sweden, United Kingdom) conducted semi-structured interviews with 4-7 experts (total N = 38). The interview guide addressed the topics "Complexity and Continuity of Care", "Formal Services", and "Public Awareness". Country-specific analysis of interview transcripts used an inductive qualitative content analysis. Cross-national synthesis focused on similarities in themes across the ActifCare countries.

resultsThe analysis revealed ten common themes and two additional sub-themes across countries. Among others, the experts highlighted the need for a coordinating role and the necessity of information to address issues of complexity and continuity of care, demanded person-centred, tailored, and multidisciplinary formal services, and referred to education, mass media and campaigns as means to raise public awareness.

conclusionsPolicy and political decision makers appear well acquainted with current discussions among both researchers and practitioners of possible approaches to improve access to dementia care. Experts described pragmatic, realistic strategies to influence dementia care. Suggested innovations concerned how to achieve improved dementia care, rather than transforming the nature of the services provided. Knowledge gained in these expert interviews may be useful to national decision makers when they consider reshaping the organisation of dementia care, and may thus help to develop best-practice strategies and recommendations.

Indexed as

Health Services AccessibilityCaregiversDecision MakingDementiaEuropeHumansInterviews as TopicPoliticsAccess to formal dementia careDementiaExpert interviews

Identifiers

PMID28774307
PMCPMC5543593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.