Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28774300›Full record

SynthesisWorld journal of surgical oncology2017

Diagnostic significance of microRNAs as novel biomarkers for bladder cancer: a meta-analysis of ten articles.

Hong-Bin Shi, Jia-Xing Yu, Jian-Xiu Yu, Zheng Feng, Chao Zhang, Guang-Yong Li, Rui-Ning Zhao, Xiao-Bo Yang

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation StudyMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in World journal of surgical oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. An Overview of Angiogenesis in Bladder Cancer.Current oncology reports · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Biomarkers in Bladder Cancer Surveillance.Frontiers in surgery · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hong-Bin ShiDepartment of Urology, Ningxia People's Hospital, No. 301 North Zhengyuan Street, Jinfeng District, Yinchuan, 750021, Ningxia, China.
Jia-Xing YuNingxia Medical University, Yinchuan, 750004, Ningxia, China.
Jian-Xiu YuNingxia Medical University, Yinchuan, 750004, Ningxia, China.
Zheng FengDepartment of Urology, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, 750004, Ningxia, China.
Chao ZhangDepartment of Urology, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, 750004, Ningxia, China.
Guang-Yong LiDepartment of Urology, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, 750004, Ningxia, China.
Rui-Ning ZhaoDepartment of Urology, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, 750004, Ningxia, China.
Xiao-Bo YangDepartment of Urology, Ningxia People's Hospital, No. 301 North Zhengyuan Street, Jinfeng District, Yinchuan, 750021, Ningxia, China. hbshiuu@163.com.
Ningxia Medical University · CNNingxia Hui Autonomous Region Peoples Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevious studies have revealed the importance of microRNAs' (miRNAs) function as biomarkers in diagnosing human bladder cancer (BC). However, the results are discordant. Consequently, the possibility of miRNAs to be BC biomarkers was summarized in this meta-analysis.

methodsIn this study, the relevant articles were systematically searched from CBM, PubMed, EMBASE, and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI). The bivariate model was used to calculate the pooled diagnostic parameters and summary receiver operator characteristic (SROC) curve in this meta-analysis, thereby estimating the whole predictive performance. STATA software was used during the whole analysis.

resultsThirty-one studies from 10 articles, including 1556 cases and 1347 controls, were explored in this meta-analysis. In short, the pooled sensitivity, area under the SROC curve, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, diagnostic odds ratio, and negative likelihood ratio were 0.72 (95%CI 0.66-0.76), 0.80 (0.77-0.84), 0.76 (0.71-0.81), 3.0 (2.4-3.8), 8 (5.0-12.0), and 0.37 (0.30-0.46) respectively. Additionally, sub-group and meta-regression analyses revealed that there were significant differences between ethnicity, miRNA profiling, and specimen sub-groups. These results suggested that Asian population-based studies, multiple-miRNA profiling, and blood-based assays might yield a higher diagnostic accuracy than their counterparts.

conclusionsThis meta-analysis demonstrated that miRNAs, particularly multiple miRNAs in the blood, might be novel, useful biomarkers with relatively high sensitivity and specificity and can be used for the diagnosis of BC. However, further prospective studies with more samples should be performed for further validation.

Indexed as

Asian PeopleBiomarkers, TumorCystoscopyHumansMicroRNAsNeoplasm StagingNuclear ProteinsOdds RatioRegression AnalysisROC CurveSensitivity and SpecificityUrinalysisUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorMicroRNAsnuclear matrix protein 22Nuclear ProteinsBladder cancerDiagnosisMeta-analysismiRNA

Identifiers

PMID28774300
PMCPMC5543742
OpenAlexW2743824770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.