Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28774299›Full record

ArticleBMC veterinary research2017

Estimation of the sensitivity and specificity of two serum ELISAs and one fecal qPCR for diagnosis of paratuberculosis in sub-clinically infected young-adult French sheep using latent class Bayesian modeling.

Yoann Mathevon, Gilles Foucras, Rémy Falguières, Fabien Corbiere

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC veterinary research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. RT-qPCR Testing and Performance Metrics in the COVID-19 Era.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Sero-surveillance ofJournal of advanced veterinary and animal research · 2020
    Article
  11. Validation of an in-house real-time PCR fecal assay and comparison with two commercial assays for the antemortem detection of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis infection in culled sheep.Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yoann MathevonIHAP, Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire de Toulouse, 23 chemin des Capelles, F-31076, Toulouse Cedex 3, France.
Gilles FoucrasIHAP, Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire de Toulouse, 23 chemin des Capelles, F-31076, Toulouse Cedex 3, France.
Rémy FalguièresCAPEL Ovilot, 237 avenue Pierre Semard, 46000, Cahors, France.
Fabien CorbiereIHAP, Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire de Toulouse, 23 chemin des Capelles, F-31076, Toulouse Cedex 3, France. f.corbiere@envt.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3006-5561
École Nationale Vétérinaire de Toulouse · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe objective was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of two serum ELISAs and one quantitative PCR on feces for the diagnosis of paratuberculosis in sub-clinically infected young-adult sheep. A cross-sectional study was performed to collect 1197 individual blood and fecal samples from 2- to 3-year-old sub-clinically infected ewes in 14 closed meat sheep flocks in France. Fecal excretion was determined using qPCR based on IS900 sequence detection, and serology was performed on serum samples using two commercial ELISAs. Data were analyzed in a 3-test multiple-population Bayesian latent class model accounting for potential dependence between the three tests fitted in OpenBUGS. Separate analyses were performed according to whether doubtful ELISA results were handled as positive or negative and based on two thresholds for fecal qPCR (Ct ≤ 42 or Ct ≤ 40).

resultsThe best fit to the data was provided by accounting for a pairwise dependence between the two ELISAs on sensitivity and pairwise dependence between the three tests on specificity. Under this model, the estimated ELISA sensitivities were 17.4% (95% PCI: 10.6 - 25.9) and 17.9% (95% PCI 11.4 - 25.6), with estimated specificities of 94.8% (95% PCI: 93.1 - 96.3) and 94.0% (95% PCI: 92.2 - 95.7). Fecal qPCR demonstrated significantly higher sensitivity (47.5%; 95% PCI: 29.3 - 69.9) and specificity (99.0%; 95% PCI: 97.9 - 99.9) than the ELISAs. Assumptions regarding doubtful ELISA results and qPCR thresholds had only a slight impact on test accuracy estimates. Models not accounting for pairwise dependence between ELISA and fecal qPCR results yielded higher sensitivity and specificity estimates but always provided a worse fit to the data.

conclusionsAlthough the overall sensitivity of serum ELISAs and fecal qPCR remains low, the higher diagnostic performances of fecal qPCR make it more suitable for paratuberculosis diagnosis in sub-clinically infected sheep. Our results also illustrate that all dependence structures should be investigated when evaluating diagnostic test accuracy and selection based on a rigorous statistical approach.

Indexed as

Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosisAnimalsBayes TheoremCross-Sectional StudiesEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFecesFemaleFranceParatuberculosisReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionSensitivity and SpecificitySheepSheep DiseasesBayesian latent class modelElisaFecal quantitative PCRParatuberculosisSensitivitySheepSpecificity

Identifiers

PMID28774299
PMCPMC5543559
OpenAlexW2744701100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.