Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28774272›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2017

Identification of candidate protective variants for common diseases and evaluation of their protective potential.

Joe M Butler, Neil Hall, Niro Narendran, Yit C Yang, Luminita Paraoan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Alzheimer's disease protective allele ofmedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Adjustment ofFrontiers in genetics · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Joe M ButlerDepartment of Eye and Vision Science, Institute of Ageing and Chronic Disease, University of Liverpool, 6 West Derby Street, Liverpool, L7 8TX, UK.
Neil HallThe Earlham Institute, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, NR4 7UH, UK.
Niro NarendranDepartment of Ophthalmology, The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, New Cross Hospital, Wolverhampton, WV10 0QP, UK.
Yit C YangDepartment of Ophthalmology, The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, New Cross Hospital, Wolverhampton, WV10 0QP, UK.
Luminita ParaoanDepartment of Eye and Vision Science, Institute of Ageing and Chronic Disease, University of Liverpool, 6 West Derby Street, Liverpool, L7 8TX, UK. lparaoan@liverpool.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-7568-7116
New Cross Hospital · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GBNorwich Research Park · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHuman polymorphisms with derived alleles that are protective against disease may provide powerful translational opportunities. Here we report a method to identify such candidate polymorphisms and apply it to common non-synonymous SNPs (nsSNPs) associated with common diseases. Our study also sought to establish which of the identified protective nsSNPs show evidence of positive selection, taking this as indirect evidence that the protective variant has a beneficial effect on phenotype. Further, we performed an analysis to quantify the predicted effect of each protective variant on protein function/structure.

resultsAn initial analysis of eight SNPs previously identified as associated with age-related macular degeneration (AMD), revealed that two of them have a derived allele that is protective against developing the disease. One is in the complement component 2 gene (C2; E318D) and the other is in the complement factor B gene (CFB; R32Q). Then, combining genomewide ancestral allele information with known common disease-associated nsSNPs from the GWAS catalog, we found 32 additional SNPs which have a derived allele that is disease protective. Out of the total 34 identified candidate protective variants (CPVs), we found that 30 show stronger evidence of positive selection than the protective variant in lipoprotein lipase (LPL; S447X), which has already been translated into gene therapy. Furthermore, 11 of these CPVs have a higher probability of affecting protein structure than the lipoprotein lipase protective variant (LPL; S447X).

conclusionsWe identify 34 CPVs from the human genome. Diseases they confer protection against include, but are not limited to, type 2 diabetes, inflammatory bowel disease, age-related macular degeneration, multiple sclerosis and rheumatoid arthritis. We propose that those 30 CPVs with evidence of stronger positive selection than the LPL protective variant, may be considered as priority candidates for therapeutic approaches. The next step towards translation will require testing the hypotheses generated by our analyses, specifically whether the CPV arose from a gain-of-function or a loss-of-function mutation.

Indexed as

GenomicsPolymorphism, Single NucleotideAllelesGain of Function MutationGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansLipoprotein LipaseMacular DegenerationLipoprotein LipaseAge-related macular degenerationAncestral alleleCandidate geneCommon variantsGain of functionGene selectionInflammatory bowel diseaseMissense mutationMultiple sclerosis and rheumatoid arthritisNon-synonymous SNPProtective variantsType 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID28774272
PMCPMC5543444
OpenAlexW2742710406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.