Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28774271›Full record

ArticleBMC medical research methodology2017

Validity and reliability of a Malay version of the brief illness perception questionnaire for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Boon-How Chew, Rimke C Vos, Monique Heijmans, Sazlina Shariff-Ghazali, Aaron Fernandez, Guy E H M Rutten

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02730078 nacompletednot on this map

The Effectiveness of a Value-based Emotion-focused Educational Programme to Reduce Diabetes-related Distress in Malay Adults With Type 2 Diabetes (VEMOFIT): a Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversiti Putra MalaysiaRan2016 to 2017Enrolled124ConditionsType 2 Diabetes MellitusArmsVEMOFIT, Attention-meetings (AG)
NCT02730754 completednot on this map

Relationship Between Emotional Disorders (Diabetes Distress and Depression) and Outcomes (Self-care and Clinical) in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Primary Care: A Retrospective Cohort Study

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversiti Putra MalaysiaRan2016 to 2016Enrolled336ConditionsType 2 Diabetes Mellitus
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Questionnaire on Perception of Threat from COVID-19.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Boon-How ChewDepartment of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia. chewboonhow@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8627-6248
Rimke C VosJulius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, Department of General Practice, University Medical Center Utrecht, Huispost Str.6.131, P.O. Box 85500, 3508, GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Monique HeijmansNIVEL, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Sazlina Shariff-GhazaliDepartment of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia.
Aaron FernandezDepartment of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia.
Guy E H M RuttenJulius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, Department of General Practice, University Medical Center Utrecht, Huispost Str.6.131, P.O. Box 85500, 3508, GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIllness perceptions involve the personal beliefs that patients have about their illness and may influence health behaviours considerably. Since an instrument to measure these perceptions for Malay population in Malaysia is lacking, we translated and examined the psychometric properties of the Malay version of the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (MBIPQ) in adult patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

methodsThe MBIPQ has nine items, all use a 0-10 response scale, except the ninth item about causal factors, which is an open-ended item. A standard procedure was used to translate and adapt the English BIPQ into Malay language. Construct validity was examined comparing item scores and scores on the Diabetes Management Self-Efficacy Scale, the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale, the World Health Organization Quality of Life-brief, the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire, the 17-item Diabetes Distress Scale, HbA1c and the presence of complications. In addition, 2-week and 4-week test-retest reliability were studied.

resultsA total of 312 patients completed the MBIPQ. Out of this, 97 and 215 patients completed the 2- or 4-weeks test-retest reliability questionnaire, respectively. Moderate inter-items correlations were observed between illness perception dimensions (r = -0.31 to 0.53). MBIPQ items showed the expected correlations with self-efficacy (r = 0.35), medication adherence (r = 0.29), quality of life (r = -0.17 to 0.31) and depressive symptoms (r = -0.18 to 0.21). People with severe diabetes-related distress also were more concern (t-test = 4.01, p < 0.001) and experienced lower personal control (t-test = 2.07, p = 0.031). People with any diabetes-related complication perceived the consequences as more serious (t-test = 2.04, p = 0.044). The 2-week and 4-week test-retest reliabilities varied between ICC

conclusionsThe psychometric properties of items in the MBIPQ are moderate. The MBIPQ showed good cross-cultural validity and moderate construct validity. Test-retest reliability was moderate. Despite the moderate psychometric properties, the MBIPQ may be useful in clinical practice as it is a useful instrument to elicit and communicate on patient's personal thoughts and feelings. Future research is needed to establish its responsiveness and predictive validity.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT02730754 registered on March 29, 2016; NCT02730078 registered on March 29, 2016.

Indexed as

LanguageTranslationsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Drug MonitoringFemaleHumansMalaysiaMaleMiddle AgedPsychometricsQuality of LifeReproducibility of ResultsSelf EfficacySurveys and QuestionnairesBeliefsBrief illness perception questionnaireEmotional distressHbA1cIllness perceptionsMedication adherenceQuality of lifeSelf-efficacyType 2 diabetes mellitusValidity

Identifiers

PMID28774271
PMCPMC5543429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.