Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28774200›Full record

SynthesisChronic respiratory disease2017

Clinical-effectiveness of self-management interventions in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: An overview of reviews.

Linda A Murphy, Patricia Harrington, Stephanie Jc Taylor, Conor Teljeur, Susan M Smith, Hilary Pinnock, Máirín Ryan

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Chronic respiratory disease, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 101 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Telemonitoring Interventions on Severe COPD Exacerbations.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Digital Health Education for Chronic Lung Disease: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The Importance of Self-Management in the Context of Personalized Care in COPD.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Linda A Murphy1 Health Technology Assessment, Health Information and Quality Authority, Dublin, Ireland.
Patricia Harrington1 Health Technology Assessment, Health Information and Quality Authority, Dublin, Ireland.
Stephanie Jc Taylor2 Centre for Primary Care and Public Health, Blizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Conor Teljeur1 Health Technology Assessment, Health Information and Quality Authority, Dublin, Ireland.
Susan M Smith3 RCSI Department of General Practice, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Hilary Pinnock4 Asthma UK Centre for Applied Research, Allergy and Respiratory Research Group, Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Scotland, Edinburgh, UK.
Máirín Ryan1 Health Technology Assessment, Health Information and Quality Authority, Dublin, Ireland.
Health Information and Quality AuthorityAsthma UK · GBHealth and Safety Authority · IEQueen Mary University of London · GBRoyal College of Surgeons in Ireland · IE

Funding

Department of Health 11/1014/04
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Self-management (SM) is defined as the provision of interventions to increase patients' skills and confidence, empowering the individual to take an active part in their disease management. There is uncertainty regarding the optimal format and the short- and long-term benefits of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) SM interventions in adults. Therefore, a high-quality overview of reviews was updated to examine their clinical effectiveness. Sixteen reviews were identified, interventions were broadly classified as education or action plans, complex interventions with an SM focus, pulmonary rehabilitation (PR), telehealth and outreach nursing. Systematic review and meta-analysis quality and the risk of bias of underlying primary studies were assessed. Strong evidence was found that PR is associated with significant improvements in health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Limited to moderate evidence for complex interventions (SM focus) with limited evidence for education, action plans, telehealth interventions and outreach nursing for HRQoL was found. There was strong evidence that education is associated with a significant reduction in COPD-related hospital admissions, moderate to strong evidence that telehealth interventions and moderate evidence that complex interventions (SM focus) are associated with reduced health care utilization. These findings from a large body of evidence suggesting that SM, through education or as a component of PR, confers significant health gains in people with COPD in terms of HRQoL. SM supported by telehealth confers significant reductions in healthcare utilization, including hospitalization and emergency department visits.

Indexed as

Self CareExercise TherapyHealth ResourcesHome Health NursingHumansPatient AdmissionPatient Education as TopicPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveReview Literature as TopicTelemedicinechronic diseaseCOPDoverview of reviewSelf-managementself-management interventionssystematic review

Identifiers

PMID28774200
PMCPMC5720233
OpenAlexW2589764305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.