Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28773384›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2016

Microparticles for Sustained Growth Factor Delivery in the Regeneration of Critically-Sized Segmental Tibial Bone Defects.

Giles T S Kirby, Lisa J White, Roland Steck, Arne Berner, Kristofor Bogoevski, Omar Qutachi, Brendan Jones, Siamak Saifzadeh, Dietmar W Hutmacher, Kevin M Shakesheff and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Strategies for Bone Regeneration: From Graft to Tissue Engineering.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Scaffolds and coatings for bone regeneration.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2020
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Giles T S KirbyInstitute of Health and Biomedical Innovation (IHBI), Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisban, QLD 4006, Australia. giles.kirby@unisa.edu.au.
Lisa J WhiteSchool of Pharmacy, University Park, The University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK. lisa.white@nottingham.ac.uk.
Roland SteckInstitute of Health and Biomedical Innovation (IHBI), Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisban, QLD 4006, Australia. r.steck@qut.edu.au.
Arne BernerInstitute of Health and Biomedical Innovation (IHBI), Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisban, QLD 4006, Australia. arne.berner@gmx.de.
Kristofor BogoevskiInstitute of Health and Biomedical Innovation (IHBI), Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisban, QLD 4006, Australia. k.bogoevski@qut.edu.au.
Omar QutachiSchool of Pharmacy, University Park, The University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK. Omar.Qutachi@nottingham.ac.uk.
Brendan JonesInstitute of Health and Biomedical Innovation (IHBI), Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisban, QLD 4006, Australia. brendanjjones@gmail.com.
Siamak SaifzadehInstitute of Health and Biomedical Innovation (IHBI), Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisban, QLD 4006, Australia. siamak.saifzadeh@qut.edu.au.
Dietmar W HutmacherInstitute of Health and Biomedical Innovation (IHBI), Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisban, QLD 4006, Australia. dietmar.hutmacher@qut.edu.au.
Kevin M ShakesheffSchool of Pharmacy, University Park, The University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK. kevin.shakesheff@nottingham.ac.uk.
Maria A WoodruffInstitute of Health and Biomedical Innovation (IHBI), Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisban, QLD 4006, Australia. mia.woodruff@qut.edu.au.
Queensland University of Technology · AUUniversity of Nottingham · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study trialled the controlled delivery of growth factors within a biodegradable scaffold in a large segmental bone defect model. We hypothesised that co-delivery of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and platelet derived growth factor (PDGF) followed by bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2) could be more effective in stimulating bone repair than the delivery of BMP-2 alone. Poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA ) based microparticles were used as a delivery system to achieve a controlled release of growth factors within a medical-grade Polycaprolactone (PCL) scaffold. The scaffolds were assessed in a well-established preclinical ovine tibial segmental defect measuring 3 cm. After six months, mechanical properties and bone tissue regeneration were assessed. Mineralised bone bridging of the defect was enhanced in growth factor treated groups. The inclusion of VEGF and PDGF (with BMP-2) had no significant effect on the amount of bone regeneration at the six-month time point in comparison to BMP-2 alone. However, regions treated with VEGF and PDGF showed increased vascularity. This study demonstrates an effective method for the controlled delivery of therapeutic growth factors

Indexed as

bonegrowth factormicroparticleregenerationrepairscaffoldsegmental defect

Identifiers

PMID28773384
PMCPMC5502923
OpenAlexW2325370350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.