ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2016
Surface Morphology and Tooth Adhesion of a Novel Nanostructured Dental Restorative Composite.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Innovative Nanostructured Fillers for Dental Resins: Nanoporous Alumina and Titania Nanotubes.Biomedicines · 2023Article
- Micromechanical interlocking structure at the filler/resin interface for dental composites: a review.International journal of oral science · 2023Review
- Influence of alumina substrates open porosity on calcium phosphates formation produced by the biomimetic method.Progress in biomaterials · 2022Article
- The outcome of direct composite restorations using the dental operating microscope.Medicine and pharmacy reports · 2021Article
- The Development of Filler Morphology in Dental Resin Composites: A Review.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Synthesis of Co-Fe 1D Nanocone Array Electrodes Using Aluminum Oxide Template.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Review of Fabrication Methods, Physical Properties, and Applications of Nanostructured Copper Oxides Formed via Electrochemical Oxidation.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018Review
- Nanoscale Topographical Characterization of Orbital Implant Materials.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recently, a novel dental restorative composite based on nanostructured micro-fillers of anodic porous alumina has been proposed. While its bulk properties are promising thanks to decreased aging and drug delivery capabilities, its surface properties are still unknown. Here we investigated the surface morphology and the adhesion to tooth dentin of this composite as prepared. For comparison, we used two commercial composites: Tetric EVO Flow (Ivoclar) and Enamel HRi Plus (Micerium). The surface morphology was characterized by atomic force microscopy and the adhesion strength by tensile tests. The experimental composite is rougher than the commercial composites, with root mean square roughness of ~549 nm against 170-511 nm, and presents an adhesion strength of ~15 MPa against 19-21 MPa. These results show at the same time some proximity to the commercial composites, but also the need for optimization of the experimental material formulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.