Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28772302›Full record

ArticleJAMA oncology2017

Cancer Risk in Families Fulfilling the Amsterdam Criteria for Lynch Syndrome.

N Jewel Samadder, Ken Robert Smith, Jathine Wong, Alun Thomas, Heidi Hanson, Kenneth Boucher, Cathryn Kopituch, Lisa A Cannon-Albright, Randall W Burt, Karen Curtin

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Risk of Prostate Cancer Associated With Familial and Hereditary Cancer Syndromes.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2020
    Article
  19. Clinical Factors Associated with Urinary Tract Cancer in Individuals with Lynch Syndrome.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

N Jewel SamadderCancer Control and Population Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City
Ken Robert SmithCancer Control and Population Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City
Jathine WongCancer Control and Population Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City
Alun ThomasHuntsman Cancer Institute, Department of Medicine (Genetic Epidemiology), University of Utah, Salt Lake City
Heidi HansonCancer Control and Population Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City
Kenneth BoucherCancer Control and Population Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City
Cathryn KopituchCancer Control and Population Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City
Lisa A Cannon-AlbrightHuntsman Cancer Institute, Department of Medicine (Genetic Epidemiology), University of Utah, Salt Lake City
Randall W BurtCancer Control and Population Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City
Karen CurtinCancer Control and Population Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City
Huntsman Cancer Institute · USUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The data describing cancer risks associated with Lynch syndrome are variable. Objectives: To quantify the prevalence of families that fulfill the Amsterdam I or II criteria for Lynch syndrome in the Utah population and investigate the risk of colonic and extracolonic cancers in family members and their relatives. Design, Setting, and Participants: In a population-based study, 202 families with Amsterdam I and II criteria–positive pedigrees in the Utah Population Database were identified. Of these, all cancer diagnoses in members of families with Amsterdam criteria and their first-degree, second-degree, and first-cousin relatives were located through linkage to the Utah Cancer Registry. The study was conducted from May 1 to June 30, 2016. Main Outcomes and Measures: Standardized morbidity ratios (SMRs) were estimated by comparing the observed rates of cancer in relatives with population-expected rates estimated internally from the Utah Population Database. Results: A total of 202 families meeting Amsterdam criteria for Lynch syndrome accounted for 2.6% of all colorectal cancers in the state; of these, 59 met both the Amsterdam I and Amsterdam II criteria. Cancers observed in significant excess in the first-degree relatives of Amsterdam criteria pedigrees included colorectal (SMR, 10.10; 95% CI, 9.43-10.81), endometrial (SMR, 5.89; 95% CI, 5.09-6.78), stomach (SMR, 2.90; 95% CI, 2.02-4.03), small intestine (SMR, 7.72; 95% CI, 5.17-11.08), prostate (SMR, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.73-2.17), kidney (SMR, 3.22; 95% CI, 2.45-4.16), urinary bladder (SMR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.22-2.12), thyroid (SMR, 2.26; 95% CI, 1.55-3.17), and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (SMR, 2.10; 95% CI, 1.64-2.65). Risks of colorectal and endometrial cancers were also found to be elevated in second-degree (SMR, 4.31; 95% CI, 3.98-4.65 and SMR, 2.70; 95% CI, 2.30-3.14, respectively) and first-cousin (SMR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.70-2.00 and SMR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.29-1.73, respectively) relatives of families with Amsterdam criteria. Conclusions and Relevance: In this population-based study of cancer risk in families fulfilling the Amsterdam criteria, many of the cancers previously reported to be associated with Lynch syndrome were observed, several previously unreported cancer associations were noted, and the risk of colorectal and endometrial cancer were markedly increased in first-, second-, and even third-degree relatives of these families. This study provides clinicians with population-based, unbiased data to counsel members of families meeting the Amsterdam criteria regarding their elevated risks of cancer and the importance of cancer screening.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsColorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary NonpolyposisEarly Detection of CancerEndometrial NeoplasmsFamilyFemaleHumansMalePedigreePrevalenceRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentSEER ProgramUtah

Identifiers

PMID28772302
PMCPMC5824265
OpenAlexW2744090059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.