Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28772149›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental research2017

Swine exposure and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection among hospitalized patients with skin and soft tissue infections in Illinois: A ZIP code-level analysis.

Glennon A Beresin, J Michael Wright, Glenn E Rice, Jyotsna S Jagai

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Occurrence of Antibiotic-ResistantInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Glennon A BeresinAssociation of Schools and Programs of Public Health Environmental Health Fellowship hosted by Environmental Protection Agency: 1900 M Street NW, Suite 710, Washington, DC 20036, United States. Electronic address: Glennon.beresin@state.ma.us.
J Michael WrightUS Environmental Protection Agency, National Center for Environmental Assessment, 26 West Martin Luther King Dr., Cincinnati, OH 45268, United States.
Glenn E RiceUS Environmental Protection Agency, National Center for Environmental Assessment, 26 West Martin Luther King Dr., Cincinnati, OH 45268, United States.
Jyotsna S JagaiUniversity of Illinois, Chicago, IL, United States.
Environmental Protection Agency · USAssociation of Schools and Programs of Public Health · USUniversity of Illinois Chicago · US

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMethicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), a bacterial pathogen, is a predominant cause of skin and soft tissue infections (SSTI) in the United States. Swine-production facilities have been recognized as potential environmental reservoirs of MRSA. To better understand how swine production may contribute to MRSA infection, we evaluated the association between MRSA infection among SSTI inpatients and exposure measures derived from national swine inventory data.

methodsBased on adjusted odds ratios from logistic regression models, we evaluated the association between swine exposure metrics and MRSA infections among all Illinois inpatient hospitalizations for SSTI from January 2008 through July 2011. We also assessed if swine exposures had greater association with suspected community-onset MRSA (CO-MRSA) compared to suspected hospital-onset MRSA (HO-MRSA). Exposures were estimated using the Farm Location and Agricultural Production Simulator, generating the number of farms with greater than 1000 swine per residential ZIP code and the residential ZIP code-level swine density (swine/km

resultsFor every increase in 100 swine/km

conclusionsThese publicly-available, ecological exposure data demonstrated positive associations between swine exposure measures and individual-level MRSA infections among SSTI inpatients. Though it is difficult to draw definitive conclusions due to limitations of the data, these findings suggest that the risk of MRSA may increase based on indirect environmental exposure to swine production. Future research can address measurement error related to these data by improving exposure assessment precision, increased specification of MRSA strain, and better characterization of specific environmental exposure pathways.

Indexed as

Animal HusbandryAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnimalsChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansIllinoisInfantInfant, NewbornMaleMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusMiddle AgedAntimicrobial resistanceConcentrated animal feeding operations (CAFOs)Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)SwineZoonosis

Identifiers

PMID28772149
PMCPMC5862075
OpenAlexW2741998052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.