Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28772119›Full record

ReviewNeuron2017

The Biology of Forgetting-A Perspective.

Ronald L Davis, Yi Zhong

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuron, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 130 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
130citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
12.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

130 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 321 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Appraisal of the Neuroprotective Effect of Dexmedetomidine: A Meta-Analysis.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A neuro-behavioural model of neophobia.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Contamination of Engram Coactivity Networks During Forgetting.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Neuronal Actin Remodeling and Its Role in Higher Nervous Activity.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

70 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ronald L DavisDepartment of Neuroscience, The Scripps Research Institute Florida, Jupiter, FL, USA. Electronic address: rdavis@scripps.edu.
Yi ZhongTsinghua-Peking Center for Life Sciences, School for Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China. Electronic address: zhongyi@tsinghua.edu.cn.
Center for Life Sciences · CNScripps Research Institute · US

Funding

Biology of memoryR35NS097224 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI DAVIS, RONALD L · 2017 to 2024
$9.1M
NEUROBIOLOGICALLY IMPORTANT GENES IIR01NS019904 · NINDS · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI DAVIS, RONALD L · 1985 to 2012
$4.4M
Olfactory memory trace formation in DrosophilaR01NS052351 · NINDS · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI DAVIS, RONALD L · 2006 to 2016
$4.2M
Molecular Biology of Drosophila Learning and MemoryR37NS019904 · NINDS · SCRIPPS FLORIDA · PI DAVIS, RONALD L · 2013 to 2016
$1.9M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS019904NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS052351NINDS NIH HHS R35 NS097224NINDS NIH HHS R37 NS019904
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pioneering research studies, beginning with those using Drosophila, have identified several molecular and cellular mechanisms for active forgetting. The currently known mechanisms for active forgetting include neurogenesis-based forgetting, interference-based forgetting, and intrinsic forgetting, the latter term describing the brain's chronic signaling systems that function to slowly degrade molecular and cellular memory traces. The best-characterized pathway for intrinsic forgetting includes "forgetting cells" that release dopamine onto engram cells, mobilizing a signaling pathway that terminates in the activation of Rac1/Cofilin to effect changes in the actin cytoskeleton and neuron/synapse structure. Intrinsic forgetting may be the default state of the brain, constantly promoting memory erasure and competing with processes that promote memory stability like consolidation. A better understanding of active forgetting will provide insights into the brain's memory management system and human brain disorders that alter active forgetting mechanisms.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrainHumansMemoryMemory DisordersNeurogenesisNeuronsSynapsesactive forgettingconsolidationdopaminehippocampal neurogenesisintrinsic forgettingmemoryRac1

Identifiers

PMID28772119
PMCPMC5657245
OpenAlexW2744751690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.