Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28772045›Full record

ArticleESC heart failure2017

TranslatiOnal Registry for CardiomyopatHies (TORCH) - rationale and first results.

Claudia Seyler, Benjamin Meder, Tanja Weis, Thea Schwaneberg, Kerstin Weitmann, Wolfgang Hoffmann, Hugo A Katus, Andreas Dösch

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ESC heart failure, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. UNRAVEL: big data analytics research data platform to improve care of patients with cardiomyopathies using routine electronic health records and standardised biobanking.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2019
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Claudia SeylerDepartment of Cardiology, Medical University Hospital Heidelberg, Germany.
Benjamin MederDepartment of Cardiology, Medical University Hospital Heidelberg, Germany.
Tanja WeisDepartment of Cardiology, Medical University Hospital Heidelberg, Germany.
Thea SchwanebergInstitute for Community Medicine, Greifswald, Germany.
Kerstin WeitmannInstitute for Community Medicine, Greifswald, Germany.
Wolfgang HoffmannInstitute for Community Medicine, Greifswald, Germany.
Hugo A KatusDepartment of Cardiology, Medical University Hospital Heidelberg, Germany.
Andreas DöschDepartment of Cardiology, Medical University Hospital Heidelberg, Germany.
Heidelberg University · DEGerman Centre for Cardiovascular Research · DEUniversitätsmedizin Greifswald · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsNon-ischemic cardiomyopathies (CMPs) comprise heart muscle disorders of different causes with high variability in disease phenotypes and clinical progression. The lack of national structures for the efficient recruitment, clinical and molecular classification, and follow-up of patients with non-ischemic CMPs limit the thorough analysis of disease mechanisms and the evaluation of novel diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. This paper describes a national, prospective, multicenter registry for patients with non-ischemic CMPs. The main objective of this registry is to create a central hub for clinical outcome studies, a joint resource for diagnostic and therapeutic trials, a common biomaterial bank, and a resource for detailed molecular analyses utilizing patients' biomaterials. METHODS AND

resultsA comprehensive characterization of the register population and patients' subgroups is planned. First analyses will include descriptive methods evaluating the distribution of outcome variables and possible risk factors followed by test statistics in a cross-sectional design. The aim of the current study is to recruit 2300 patients all over Germany. Eligible participants are patients with primary non-ischemic cardiomyopathies, including hereditary and inflammatory dilated CMP (DCM), left-ventricular noncompaction CMP (LVNC), hypertrophic CMP (HCM), arrhythmogenic right-ventricular CMP (ARVC), myocarditis, and amyloidosis. Of already recruited patients 70% are male and 30% female. With 56% of patients included, DCM is most common. CONCLUSION/OUTCOME: The primary outcome is all-cause death. Key secondary endpoints are cardiovascular death, adequate ICD shock, survived sudden cardiac death, syncope, documented potentially life-threatening arrhythmia, cardiac transplantation, hospitalization due to worsening of heart failure (HF), and any non-elective cardiovascular hospitalization.

Indexed as

CardiomyopathyHeart failureNon-ischemicRegistry

Identifiers

PMID28772045
PMCPMC5542726
OpenAlexW2602717534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.