Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28771973›Full record

Observational studyArthritis care & research2018

Trends and Determinants of Osteoporosis Treatment and Screening in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis Compared to Osteoarthritis.

Gulsen Ozen, Diane L Kamen, Ted R Mikuls, Bryant R England, Frederick Wolfe, Kaleb Michaud

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Arthritis care & research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Osteoporosis in Rheumatic Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Gulsen OzenUniversity of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, and Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Diane L KamenMedical University of South Carolina, Charleston.
Ted R MikulsUniversity of Nebraska Medical Center and Veterans Affairs Nebraska-Western Iowa Health Care System, Omaha.ORCID 0000-0002-0897-2272
Bryant R EnglandUniversity of Nebraska Medical Center and Veterans Affairs Nebraska-Western Iowa Health Care System, Omaha.ORCID 0000-0002-9649-3588
Frederick WolfeNational Data Bank for Rheumatic Diseases, Wichita, Kansas.
Kaleb MichaudUniversity of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, and National Data Bank for Rheumatic Diseases, Wichita, Kansas.ORCID 0000-0002-5350-3934
The National Databank for Rheumatic Diseases · USVA Nebraska Western Iowa Health Care System · USMedical University of South Carolina · USUniversity of Nebraska Medical Center · US

Funding

Tracking and Evaluation CoreU54GM115458 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI GUDA, CHITTIBABU · 2016 to 2025
$42.8M
UNMC Summer Undergraduate Alcohol Research ProgramR25AA020818 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI Kristina L Bailey · 2012 to 2026
$931k
NIAAA NIH HHS R25 AA020818NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM115458
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo profile osteoporosis (OP) care in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) over the past decade.

methodsPatients with RA or osteoarthritis (OA) were followed from 2003 through 2014. OP care was defined as receipt of OP treatment (with the exception of calcium/vitamin D) or screening (OPTS). Adjusted trends over followup, and the factors associated with OP care, were examined using multivariable Cox proportional hazards.

resultsOPTS was reported in 67.4% of 11,669 RA patients and in 64.6% of 2,829 OA patients during a median (interquartile range) 5.5 (2-9) years of followup. In patients for whom treatment was recommended by the 2010 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) glucocorticoid-induced OP (GIOP) guidelines (48.4% of RA patients and 17.6% of OA patients), approximately 55% overall reported OP medication use. RA patients were not more likely to undergo OPTS compared to OA patients (hazard ratio 1.04 [95% confidence interval 0.94-1.15]). Adjusted models showed a stable trend for OPTS between 2004 and 2008 compared to 2003, with a significant downward trend after 2008 in both RA and OA patients. Factors associated with receipt of OP care in RA patients were older age, postmenopausal state, prior fragility fracture or diagnosis of OP, any duration of glucocorticoid treatment, and use of biologic agents.

conclusionApproximately half of RA patients for whom treatment was indicated never received an OP medication. OP care in RA patients was not better than in OA patients, and the relative risk of the application of this care has been decreasing in RA and OA patients since 2008 without improvement after the release of the 2010 ACR GIOP guideline.

Indexed as

AdultAgedArthritis, RheumatoidCohort StudiesFemaleGlucocorticoidsHumansMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedOsteoarthritisOsteoporosisGlucocorticoids

Identifiers

PMID28771973
PMCPMC5797515
OpenAlexW2744475330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.