Trial reportPloS one2017
Treatment of preschool children presenting to the emergency department with wheeze with azithromycin: A placebo-controlled randomized trial.
Trial report in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.
- Macrolides versus placebo for chronic asthma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Safety of azithromycin in pediatrics: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2020Pooled it
- Interventions for escalation of therapy for acute exacerbations of asthma in children: an overview of Cochrane Reviews.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Efficacy of Macrolides on Acute Asthma or Wheezing Exacerbations in Children with Recurrent Wheezing: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Paediatric drugs · 2020Pooled it
- Adverse events in people taking macrolide antibiotics versus placebo for any indication.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019Pooled it
- The effects of macrolides in children with reactive airway disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Drug design, development and therapy · 2018Pooled it
- Azithromycin for Preschoolers with Wheezing in the Emergency Department.The New England journal of medicine · 2026Trial
- Azithromycin administered for acute bronchiolitis may have a protective effect on subsequent wheezing.Jornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e TisilogiaTrial
- Asthma Phenotypes and Biomarkers.Respiratory care · 2025Review
- Article
- Review
- Diagnosis and management of asthma in infants and preschoolers.Clinical and experimental pediatrics · 2022Article
- Management of Preschool Wheezing: Guideline from the Emilia-Romagna Asthma (ERA) Study Group.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Article
- Safety of azithromycin in pediatric infectious diseases: a clinical systematic review and meta-analysis.Translational pediatrics · 2021Article
- Childhood asthma heterogeneity at the era of precision medicine: Modulating the immune response or the microbiota for the management of asthma attack.Biochemical pharmacology · 2020Review
- Exacerbation-Prone Asthma.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice · 2020Article
- Two Sides of the Same Coin?-Treatment of Chronic Asthma in Children and Adults.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2019Review
- Article
- Effects of Macrolide Treatment during the Hospitalization of Children with Childhood Wheezing Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAntibiotics are frequently used to treat wheezing children. Macrolides may be effective in treating bronchiolitis and asthma.
methodWe completed a prospective, double-blinded, randomized placebo-control trial of azithromycin among pre-school children (12 to 60 months of age) presenting to the emergency department with wheeze. Patients were randomized to receive either five days of azithromycin or placebo. Primary outcome was time to resolution of respiratory symptoms after treatment initiation. Secondary outcomes included the number of days children used a Short-Acting Beta-Agonists during the 21 day follow-up and time to disease exacerbation during the following six months (unscheduled health care visit or treatment with an oral corticosteroid for acute respiratory symptoms).
resultsOf the 300 wheezing children recruited, 222 and 169 were analyzed for the primary and secondary outcomes, respectively. The treatment groups had similar demographics and clinical parameters at baseline. Median time to resolution of respiratory symptoms was four days for both treatment arms (interquartile range (IQR) 3,6; p = 0.28). Median number of days of Short-Acting Beta-Agonist use among those who received azithromycin was four and a half days (IQR 2, 7) and five days (IQR 2, 9; p = 0.22) among those who received placebo. Participants who received azithromycin had a 0.91 hazard ratio for time to six-month exacerbation compared to placebo (95% CI 0.61, 1.36, p = 0.65). A pre-determined subgroup analysis showed no differences in outcomes for children with their first or repeat episode of wheezing. There was no significant difference in the proportion of participants experiencing an adverse event.
conclusionAzithromycin neither reduced duration of respiratory symptoms nor time to respiratory exacerbation in the following six months after treatment among wheezing preschool children presenting to an emergency department. There was no significant effect among children with either first-time or prior wheezing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.