ArticlePloS one2017
Detection and quantification of beef and pork materials in meat products by duplex droplet digital PCR.
Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 85 citations in OpenAlex.
- In-silico Analysis of the Cytochrome B Gene and its Role in Species Traceability from Fresh Meat Samples Through a Non-enzymatic DNA Extraction Method.Molecular biotechnology · 2026Article
- Mammalian and avian species quantification in homogenized foods: real time PCR and digital PCR as tools for label compliance controls.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Article
- Research on quantitative detection technology of raccoon-derived ingredient adulteration in sausage products.Food science & nutrition · 2024Article
- Digital PCR assay for the specific detection and estimation ofCurrent research in food science · 2024Article
- A Droplet Digital PCR-Based Approach for Quantitative Analysis of the Adulteration of Atlantic Salmon with Rainbow Trout.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Article
- A Droplet Digital PCR Based Approach for Identification and Quantification of Porcine and Chicken Derivatives in Beef.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Detection and Quantification of Adulterated Beef and Mutton Products by Multiplex Droplet Digital PCR.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Development and Application of a Visual Duck Meat Detection Strategy for Molecular Diagnosis of Duck-Derived Components.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Detection of Species Substitution in the Meat Value Chain by High-Resolution Melting Analysis of Mitochondrial PCR Products.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- DNA Accounting: Tallying Genomes to Detect Adulterated Saffron.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Determining the presence of undeclared animal species using Real-time PCR in canned and ready-to-eat meat products in South Africa.Journal of food science and technology · 2021Article
- Safety, Quality and Analytical Authentication of ḥalāl Meat Products, with Particular Emphasis on Salami: A Review.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- The Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in Wild Boars from Three Voivodeships in Poland, MAT Analyses.Acta parasitologica · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Meat products often consist of meat from multiple animal species, and inaccurate food product adulteration and mislabeling can negatively affect consumers. Therefore, a cost-effective and reliable method for identification and quantification of animal species in meat products is required. In this study, we developed a duplex droplet digital PCR (dddPCR) detection and quantification system to simultaneously identify and quantify the source of meat in samples containing a mixture of beef (Bos taurus) and pork (Sus scrofa) in a single digital PCR reaction tube. Mixed meat samples of known composition were used to test the accuracy and applicability of this method. The limit of detection (LOD) and the limit of quantification (LOQ) of this detection and quantification system were also identified. We conclude that our dddPCR detection and quantification system is suitable for quality control and routine analyses of meat products.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.