Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28771552›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

The pathological structure of the perivascular niche in different microvascular patterns of glioblastoma.

Jintao Chen, Sifeng Mao, Haifang Li, Mingcheng Zheng, Linglu Yi, Jin-Ming Lin, Zhi-Xiong Lin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Glioblastoma Stem Cells-Useful Tools in the Battle against Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Proteomic Distributions in CD34+ Microvascular Niche Patterns of Glioblastoma.The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jintao ChenDepartment of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.
Sifeng MaoDepartment of Chemistry, Beijing Key Laboratory of Microanalytical Methods and Instrumentation, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8140-8379
Haifang LiDepartment of Chemistry, Beijing Key Laboratory of Microanalytical Methods and Instrumentation, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Mingcheng ZhengDepartment of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.
Linglu YiDepartment of Chemistry, Beijing Key Laboratory of Microanalytical Methods and Instrumentation, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Jin-Ming LinDepartment of Chemistry, Beijing Key Laboratory of Microanalytical Methods and Instrumentation, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Zhi-Xiong LinDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Sanbo Brain Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Tsinghua University · CNFujian Medical University · CNCapital Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The perivascular niche is critical for intercellular communication between resident cell types in glioblastoma (GBM), and it plays a vital role in maintaining the glioma stem cell (GSC) microenvironment. It is shown in abundant research that different microvascular patterns exist in GBM; and it can be implied that different microvascular patterns are associated with different pathological structures in the perivascular niche. However, the pathological structure of the perivascular niche is still not clear. Here, we investigated the distribution and biological characteristics of different microvascular pattern niches (MVPNs) in GBM by detecting the expression of CD34, CD133, Nestin, α-SMA, GFAP and CD14 in the perivascular niche using multiple -fluorescence. The four basic microvascular patterns are microvascular sprouting (MS), vascular cluster (VC), vascular garland (VG), and glomeruloid vascular proliferation (GVP). By analyzing the proportion of the area of each marker in four types of formations, the results indicated that the expression of CD34, CD133 and Nestin in MS and VC was significantly lower than that in VG and GVP (P<0.05). Furthermore, the results showed that α-SMA expression different in the MS, VC, VG and GVP (P<0.05). However, the expression of GFAP and CD14 in each type of formation exhibited no significant difference (P>0.05). According to the area distributions of different markers, we mapped four precise simulation diagrams to provide an effective foundation for the accurate simulation of glioblastoma in vitro.

Indexed as

AC133 AntigenActinsAdolescentAdultAgedAntigens, CD34Brain NeoplasmsFemaleGlial Fibrillary Acidic ProteinGlioblastomaHumansLipopolysaccharide ReceptorsMaleMicroscopy, FluorescenceMicrovesselsMiddle AgedAC133 AntigenACTA2 protein, humanActinsAntigens, CD34Glial Fibrillary Acidic ProteinLipopolysaccharide ReceptorsNestin

Identifiers

PMID28771552
PMCPMC5542434
OpenAlexW2744060943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.