SynthesisPloS one2017
Cholecystectomy can increase the risk of colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis of 10 cohort studies.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It carries an expression of concern. Cited by 48 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
48 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Association between cholecystectomy/gallbladder pathology and colorectal polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Association between history of cholecystectomy and risk of gastric cancer: a meta-analysis of epidemiological studies.BMJ open · 2023Pooled it
- Cholecystectomy promotes the development of colorectal cancer by the alternation of bile acid metabolism and the gut microbiota.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Association Between Cholecystectomy and Gastric Cancer Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Pooled it
- Causal effects of gallstone disease on risk of gastrointestinal cancer in Chinese.British journal of cancer · 2021Pooled it
- Long-term risk of colorectal cancer following cholecystectomy: a nationwide cohort study.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Observational
- Cholecystectomy-associated gut microbiota dysbiosis promotes colorectal carcinogenesis: from epidemiological controversy to FXR-centered mechanistic insights.Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute · 2026Review
- Gallbladder disease and colorectal cancer: a two-sample bidirectional Mendelian randomization study.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- Association between cholecystectomy and colorectal cancer: results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2017-2023 and Mendelian randomization analyses.Translational cancer research · 2025Article
- Asymptomatic gallstone disease: Re-evaluating the threshold for surgical options in the era of precision medicine.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025Review
- Cholecystectomy-related gut microbiota dysbiosis exacerbates colorectal tumorigenesis.Nature communications · 2025Article
- The Impact of Cholecystectomy on Colorectal Cancer Risk: A Comprehensive Review on Risk Factors and the Association.Current gastroenterology reports · 2025Review
- Effect of smoking on the risk of gastrointestinal cancer after cholecystectomy: A national population-based cohort study.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2024Article
- Alteration of ascending colon mucosal microbiota in patients after cholecystectomy.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2024Article
- Expression of Concern: Cholecystectomy can increase the risk of colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis of 10 cohort studies.PloS one · 2024Article
- Postcolonoscopy Colorectal Cancer in a Referral Center for Colorectal Cancer: Prevalence and Risk Factors.GE Portuguese journal of gastroenterology · 2023Article
- The association between cholecystectomy and the risk of colorectal cancer: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies.Translational cancer research · 2023Article
- Fungal infections and the fungal microbiome in hepatobiliary disorders.Journal of hepatology · 2023Review
- Bile acids as carcinogens in the colon and at other sites in the gastrointestinal system.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
- Expression of concern
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to elucidate the effects of cholecystectomy on the risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) by conducting a meta-analysis of 10 cohort studies.
methodsThe eligible cohort studies were selected by searching the PubMed and EMBASE databases from their origination to June 30, 2016, as well as by consulting the reference lists of the selected articles. Two authors individually collected the data from the 10 papers. When the data showed marked heterogeneity, we used a random-effects model to estimate the overall pooled risk; otherwise, a fixed effects model was employed.
resultsThe final analysis included ten cohort studies. According to the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS), nine papers were considered high quality. After the data of these 9 studies were combined, an increased risk of CRC was found among the individuals who had undergone cholecystectomy (risk ratio (RR) 1.22; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.08-1.38). In addition, we also found a promising increased risk for colon cancer (CC) (RR 1.30, 95% CI 1.07-1.58), but no relationship between cholecystectomy and rectum cancer (RC) (RR 1.09; 95% CI 0.89-1.34) was observed. Additionally, in the sub-group analysis of the tumor location in the colon, a positive risk for ascending colon cancer (ACC) was found (RR 1.18, 95% CI 1.11-1.26). After combining the ACC, transverse colon cancer (TCC), sigmoid colon cancer (SCC) and descending colon cancer (DCC) patients, we found a positive relationship with cholecystectomy (RR 1.18, 95% CI 1.11-1.26). Furthermore, after combining the ACC and DCC patients, we also found a positive relationship with cholecystectomy (RR 1.28; 95% CI 1.11-1.26) in the sub-group analysis. In an additional sub-group analysis of patients from Western countries, there was a positive relationship between cholecystectomy and the risk of CRC (RR 1.20; 95% CI 1.05-1.36). Furthermore, a positive relationship between female gender and CRC was also found (RR 1.17; 95% CI 1.03-1.34). However, there was no relationship between gender and CC or RC. Furthermore, no publication bias was observed, and the sensitivity analysis indicated stable results.
conclusionsThis meta-analysis of 10 cohort studies revealed that cholecystectomy is associated with an increased risk for CRC, CC and ACC, particularly in Western countries. No relationship between cholecystectomy and RC was observed. There was no relationship between gender and either CC or RC, but a positive relationship between female gender and CRC was observed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.