Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28771487›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Cardiorespiratory dynamics measured from continuous ECG monitoring improves detection of deterioration in acute care patients: A retrospective cohort study.

Travis J Moss, Matthew T Clark, James Forrest Calland, Kyle B Enfield, John D Voss, Douglas E Lake, J Randall Moorman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Time-series ECG Imputation Using a Pattern-Based Masking Framework.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Travis J MossDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States of America.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9997-6075
Matthew T ClarkCenter for Advanced Medical Analytics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States of America.
James Forrest CallandCenter for Advanced Medical Analytics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States of America.
Kyle B EnfieldCenter for Advanced Medical Analytics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States of America.
John D VossDepartment of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States of America.
Douglas E LakeDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States of America.
J Randall MoormanDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States of America.

Funding

Neonatal apnea: Online risk score from new analyses of bedside monitor waveformsRC2HD064488 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI KATTWINKEL, JOHN, MOORMAN, JOSEPH RANDALL · 2009 to 2010
$2.0M
NICHD NIH HHS RC2 HD064488
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCharted vital signs and laboratory results represent intermittent samples of a patient's dynamic physiologic state and have been used to calculate early warning scores to identify patients at risk of clinical deterioration. We hypothesized that the addition of cardiorespiratory dynamics measured from continuous electrocardiography (ECG) monitoring to intermittently sampled data improves the predictive validity of models trained to detect clinical deterioration prior to intensive care unit (ICU) transfer or unanticipated death. METHODS AND

findingsWe analyzed 63 patient-years of ECG data from 8,105 acute care patient admissions at a tertiary care academic medical center. We developed models to predict deterioration resulting in ICU transfer or unanticipated death within the next 24 hours using either vital signs, laboratory results, or cardiorespiratory dynamics from continuous ECG monitoring and also evaluated models using all available data sources. We calculated the predictive validity (C-statistic), the net reclassification improvement, and the probability of achieving the difference in likelihood ratio χ2 for the additional degrees of freedom. The primary outcome occurred 755 times in 586 admissions (7%). We analyzed 395 clinical deteriorations with continuous ECG data in the 24 hours prior to an event. Using only continuous ECG measures resulted in a C-statistic of 0.65, similar to models using only laboratory results and vital signs (0.63 and 0.69 respectively). Addition of continuous ECG measures to models using conventional measurements improved the C-statistic by 0.01 and 0.07; a model integrating all data sources had a C-statistic of 0.73 with categorical net reclassification improvement of 0.09 for a change of 1 decile in risk. The difference in likelihood ratio χ2 between integrated models with and without cardiorespiratory dynamics was 2158 (p value: <0.001).

conclusionsCardiorespiratory dynamics from continuous ECG monitoring detect clinical deterioration in acute care patients and improve performance of conventional models that use only laboratory results and vital signs.

Indexed as

ElectrocardiographyPatient CareAgedCardiovascular SystemFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedModels, StatisticalPatient AdmissionPatient TransferPrognosisRespiratory SystemRetrospective StudiesVital Signs

Identifiers

PMID28771487
PMCPMC5542430

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.