Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28771477›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2017

Deconstructing isolation-by-distance: The genomic consequences of limited dispersal.

Stepfanie M Aguillon, John W Fitzpatrick, Reed Bowman, Stephan J Schoech, Andrew G Clark, Graham Coop, Nancy Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Conservation Units for Anadromous Arctic Char (Evolutionary applications · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Phylogeography ofBiology · 2025
    Article
  8. The effect of habitat loss and fragmentation on isolation by distance and divergence.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. A geographic history of human genetic ancestry.Science (New York, N.Y.) · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. A geographic history of human genetic ancestry.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Stepfanie M AguillonDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States of America.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8254-6124
John W FitzpatrickDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States of America.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6330-8403
Reed BowmanArchbold Biological Station, Venus, Florida, United States of America.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6027-798X
Stephan J SchoechDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee, United States of America.
Andrew G ClarkDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States of America.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7159-8511
Graham CoopCenter for Population Biology & Department of Evolution and Ecology, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, United States of America.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8431-0302
Nancy ChenCornell Laboratory of Ornithology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States of America.

Funding

Genome-wide approaches to polygenic adaptationR01GM108779 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI COOP, GRAHAM · 2014 to 2019
$1.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM108779
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Geographically limited dispersal can shape genetic population structure and result in a correlation between genetic and geographic distance, commonly called isolation-by-distance. Despite the prevalence of isolation-by-distance in nature, to date few studies have empirically demonstrated the processes that generate this pattern, largely because few populations have direct measures of individual dispersal and pedigree information. Intensive, long-term demographic studies and exhaustive genomic surveys in the Florida Scrub-Jay (Aphelocoma coerulescens) provide an excellent opportunity to investigate the influence of dispersal on genetic structure. Here, we used a panel of genome-wide SNPs and extensive pedigree information to explore the role of limited dispersal in shaping patterns of isolation-by-distance in both sexes, and at an exceedingly fine spatial scale (within ~10 km). Isolation-by-distance patterns were stronger in male-male and male-female comparisons than in female-female comparisons, consistent with observed differences in dispersal propensity between the sexes. Using the pedigree, we demonstrated how various genealogical relationships contribute to fine-scale isolation-by-distance. Simulations using field-observed distributions of male and female natal dispersal distances showed good agreement with the distribution of geographic distances between breeding individuals of different pedigree relationship classes. Furthermore, we built coalescent simulations parameterized by the observed dispersal curve, population density, and immigration rate, and showed how incorporating these extensions to Malécot's theory of isolation-by-distance allows us to accurately reconstruct observed sex-specific isolation-by-distance patterns in autosomal and Z-linked SNPs. Therefore, patterns of fine-scale isolation-by-distance in the Florida Scrub-Jay can be well understood as a result of limited dispersal over contemporary timescales.

Indexed as

Genetics, PopulationPopulation DensityAnimalsFemaleGenetic VariationGenomicsGenotypeMaleMicrosatellite RepeatsPasseriformesReproductive Isolation

Identifiers

PMID28771477
PMCPMC5542401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.