Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28771391›Full record

ArticleJournal of women's health (2002)2017

Gender Differences in Receipt of National Institutes of Health R01 Grants Among Junior Faculty at an Academic Medical Center: The Role of Connectivity, Rank, and Research Productivity.

Erica T Warner, René Carapinha, Griffin M Weber, Emorcia V Hill, Joan Y Reede

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of women's health (2002), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Exploring Gender Bias in Six Key Domains of Academic Science: An Adversarial Collaboration.Psychological science in the public interest : a journal of the American Psychological Society · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Erica T Warner1 Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital , Boston, Massachusetts.
René Carapinha3 Office for Diversity Inclusion and Community Partnership, Harvard Medical School , Boston, Massachusetts.
Griffin M Weber5 Department of Biomedical Informatics, Center for Biomedical Informatics , Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Emorcia V Hill3 Office for Diversity Inclusion and Community Partnership, Harvard Medical School , Boston, Massachusetts.
Joan Y Reede1 Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital , Boston, Massachusetts.

Funding

Modeling scientific workforce dynamics using social network analysisU01GM112623 · NIGMS · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI WEBER, GRIFFIN M · 2015 to 2018
$1.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS U01 GM112623
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine whether there were gender differences in likelihood of receiving a first National Institutes of Health (NIH) R01 award among 5445 instructors and assistant professors at Harvard Medical School (HMS). MATERIALS AND

methodsData on R01 award principal investigators were obtained from NIH ExPORTER and linked with faculty data. Using Cox proportional hazard regression, we examined the association of gender with receipt of first R01 award between 2008 and 2015 accounting for demographics, research productivity metrics, and professional characteristics.

resultsCompared to males, females had fewer publications, lower h-index, smaller coauthor networks and were less likely to be assistant professors (p < 0.0001). Four hundred and thirteen of 5445 faculty (7.6%) received their first R01 award during the study period. There was no gender difference in receipt of R01 awards in age-adjusted (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.87, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.70-1.08) or multivariable-adjusted models (HR: 1.07, 95% CI: 0.86-1.34). Compared to white males, there was a nonsignificant 10%, 18%, and 30% lower rate of R01 receipt among white, Asian or Pacific Islander, and underrepresented minority females, respectively. These differences were eliminated in the multivariable-adjusted model. Network reach, age, HMS start year, h-index, academic rank, previous K award, terminal degree, and HMS training were all significant predictors of receiving an R01 award.

conclusionsA relatively small proportion of HMS junior faculty obtained their first NIH R01 award during the study period. There was no significant gender difference in likelihood of award. However, we are unable to distinguish faculty that never applied from those who applied and were not successful.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchAcademic Medical CentersAdultAwards and PrizesFaculty, MedicalFellowships and ScholarshipsFemaleFinancing, GovernmentHumansMaleMiddle AgedNational Institutes of Health (U.S.)Research PersonnelResearch Support as TopicSchools, MedicalSex FactorsgenderNIH grantsR01

Identifiers

PMID28771391
PMCPMC5651959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.