ArticleJournal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology2018
Initial Cluster Analysis.
Article in Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Identifying Function Determining Residues in Neuroimmune Semaphorin 4A.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- SPARC: Structural properties associated with residue constraints.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022Article
- Statistical investigations of protein residue direct couplings.PLoS computational biology · 2018Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We study a simple abstract problem motivated by a variety of applications in protein sequence analysis. Consider a string of 0s and 1s of length L, and containing D 1s. If we believe that some or all of the 1s may be clustered near the start of the sequence, which subset is the most significantly so clustered, and how significant is this clustering? We approach this question using the minimum description length principle and illustrate its application by analyzing residues that distinguish translational initiation and elongation factor guanosine triphosphatases (GTPases) from other P-loop GTPases. Within a structure of yeast elongation factor 1[Formula: see text], these residues form a significant cluster centered on a region implicated in guanine nucleotide exchange. Various biomedical questions may be cast as the abstract problem considered here.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.