Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28771312›Full record

ArticleACS synthetic biology2017

Multiplexing Engineered Receptors for Multiparametric Evaluation of Environmental Ligands.

Rachel M Hartfield, Kelly A Schwarz, Joseph J Muldoon, Neda Bagheri, Joshua N Leonard

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS synthetic biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The evolution of synthetic receptor systems.Nature chemical biology · 2022
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Elucidation and refinement of synthetic receptor mechanisms.Synthetic biology (Oxford, England) · 2020
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rachel M HartfieldDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Northwestern University , Evanston, Illinois 60208, United States.
Kelly A SchwarzDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Northwestern University , Evanston, Illinois 60208, United States.
Joseph J MuldoonDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Northwestern University , Evanston, Illinois 60208, United States.
Neda BagheriDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Northwestern University , Evanston, Illinois 60208, United States.
Joshua N LeonardDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Northwestern University , Evanston, Illinois 60208, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4359-6126
Northwestern University · US

Funding

Tumor Environment and Metastasis (TEAM) Research ProgramP30CA060553 · NCI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI Daniela E Matei · 1993 to 2026
$153.9M
Developing Capacity to Evaluate Training Programs via Development of Human, Institutional and Social CapitalT32GM008449 · NIGMS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY · PI LEONARD, JOSHUA NATHANIEL · 1993 to 2023
$7.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA060553NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008449
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Engineered cell-based therapies comprise a promising, emerging biomedical technology. Broad utilization of this strategy will require new approaches for implementing sophisticated functional programs, such as sensing and responding to the environment in a defined fashion. Toward this goal, we investigated whether our self-contained receptor and signal transduction system (MESA) could be multiplexed to evaluate extracellular cues, with a focus on elucidating principles governing the integration of such engineered components. We first developed a set of hybrid promoters that exhibited AND gate activation by two transcription factors. We then evaluated these promoters when paired with two MESA receptors and various ligand combinations. Unexpectedly, although the multiplexed system exhibited distinct responses to ligands applied individually and in combination, the same synergy was not observed as when promoters were characterized with soluble transcription factors. Therefore, we developed a mechanistic computational model leveraging these observations, to both improve our understanding of how the receptors and promoters interface and to guide the design and implementation of future systems. Notably, the model explicitly accounts for the impact of intercellular variation on system characterization and performance. Model analysis identified key factors that affect the current receptors and promoters, and enabled an in silico exploration of potential modifications that inform the design of improved logic gates and their robustness to intercellular variation. Ultimately, this quantitative design-driven approach may guide the use and multiplexing of synthetic receptors for diverse custom biological functions beyond the case study considered here.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalReceptors, Cell SurfaceSignal TransductionEnvironmental MonitoringGenetic EngineeringHEK293 CellsHumansLigandsLigandsReceptors, Cell Surfacebiosensorcomputational modelgenetic circuitintercellular variationmammalianreceptor engineering

Identifiers

PMID28771312
PMCPMC5693605
OpenAlexW2742986498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.