Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28771241›Full record

ArticleClinical and translational gastroenterology2017

Efficacy and Safety of Endoscopic Resection Followed by Chemoradiotherapy for Superficial Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Retrospective Study.

Kenta Hamada, Ryu Ishihara, Yasushi Yamasaki, Noboru Hanaoka, Sachiko Yamamoto, Masamichi Arao, Sho Suzuki, Taro Iwatsubo, Minoru Kato, Yusuke Tonai and 14 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and translational gastroenterology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. [Clinical Practice Guideline for Endoscopic Resection of Early Gastrointestinal Cancer].The Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi · 2020
    Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Current status of esophageal cancer treatment.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Kenta HamadaDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan.
Ryu IshiharaDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan.
Yasushi YamasakiDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan.
Noboru HanaokaDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan.
Sachiko YamamotoDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan.
Masamichi AraoDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan.
Sho SuzukiDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan.
Taro IwatsuboDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan.
Minoru KatoDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan.
Yusuke TonaiDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan.
Satoki ShichijoDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan.
Noriko MatsuuraDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan.
Hiroko NakahiraDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan.
Takashi KanesakaDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan.
Tomofumi AkasakaDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan.
Yoji TakeuchiDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan.
Koji HigashinoDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan.
Noriya UedoDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan.
Hiroyasu IishiDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan.
Naoyuki KanayamaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan.
Takero HirataDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan.
Yoshifumi KawaguchiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan.
Koji KonishiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan.
Teruki TeshimaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe reported 1- and 3-year overall survival rates after esophagectomy for stage I superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SESCC) are 95-97% and 86%, and those after definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) are 98% and 89%, respectively. This study was performed to elucidate the efficacy and safety of another treatment option for SESCC: endoscopic resection (ER) followed by CRT.

methodsWe retrospectively reviewed the overall survival, recurrence, and grade ≥3 adverse events of consecutive patients who refused esophagectomy and underwent ER followed by CRT for SESCC from 1 January 2006 to 31 December 2012.

resultsIn total, 66 patients with SESCC underwent ER followed by CRT during the study period, and complete follow-up data were available for all patients. The median age was 67 (range, 45-82) years, and the median observation period was 51 (range, 7-103) months. Local and metastatic recurrences occurred in 2 (3%) and 6 (9%) patients, respectively, and 17 (26%) patients died. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates were 98%, 87%, and 75%, respectively. One of the 23 patients with mucosal cancer and 5 of 43 with submucosal cancer developed metastatic recurrences (P=0.65). Five of the 61 patients with negative vertical resection margin and 1 of 5 with positive vertical resection margin developed metastatic recurrences (P=0.39). None of the 30 patients without lymphovascular involvement developed metastatic recurrences; however, 6 of 36 patients with lymphovascular involvement developed metastatic recurrences (P=0.0098). Grade ≥3 adverse events occurred in 21 (32%) patients and all adverse events were associated with CRT, hematological adverse events in 13 (20%), and non-hematological adverse events in 9 (14%).

conclusionsER followed by CRT provides survival comparable with that of esophagectomy or definitive CRT and has a low local recurrence rate. A particularly favorable outcome is expected for cancers without lymphovascular involvement.

Identifiers

PMID28771241
PMCPMC5587838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.