SynthesisJournal of human hypertension2017
A systematic review and meta-analysis of exercise and exercise hypertension in patients with aortic coarctation.
Synthesis in Journal of human hypertension, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Brazilian Guideline for Exercise Testing in Children and Adolescents - 2024.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2024Guideline
- Isolated Coarctation of the Aorta: Current Concepts and Perspectives.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Stress Echocardiography in the Follow-Up of Young Patients with Repaired Aortic Coarctation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Exercise hypertension is a common occurrence among individuals with aortic coarctation. Although exercise is known to be beneficial among the general population, the risks and benefits of exercise among those with aortic coarctation are less clear. This systematic review evaluates the benefits and risks of exercise for persons with aortic coarctation. Electronic databases were systematically searched (that is, MEDLINE and EMBASE) and key reviews cross-referenced to identify articles for inclusion. Original research articles reporting exercise among individuals with aortic coarctation were included. From 2608 individual citations, 68 eligible articles were identified. Aerobic exercise stress tests were found to be useful for determining exercise hypertension experiences post-surgical repair (N=5), and other long-term secondary findings (N=3). Experiences of exercise hypertension were associated with abnormal cardiac and/or aortic geometry and cardiac function (N=7). Exercise capacity was generally found to be similar to non-aortic coarctation controls post surgery (N=6). Exercise hypertension was experienced by 27% of participants, including 10% of adults and 43% of children/youth. Individuals who experience exercise hypertension experience greater increases in systolic blood pressure with exercise. No investigations identified evaluated forms of exercise other than aerobic stress tests and no exercise training programs have been conducted to date. Exercise stress tests can be valuable in this population for determining exercise hypertension, especially in the year post-surgical repair. Additional research is urgently needed to accurately assess the benefits and risks of exercise and exercise hypertension, and applicability of exercise restrictions for this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.