Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28770589›Full record

ArticleJournal of the International AIDS Society2017

Implications of differentiated care for successful ART scale-up in a concentrated HIV epidemic in Yangon, Myanmar.

Anita Mesic, Julie Fontaine, Theingy Aye, Jane Greig, Thin Thin Thwe, Laura Moretó-Planas, Jarmila Kliesckova, Khin Khin, Nana Zarkua, Lucia Gonzalez and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the International AIDS Society, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Evidence for scale up: the differentiated care research agenda.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2017
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Anita MesicMédecins Sans Frontières, Operational Center Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Julie FontaineMédecins Sans Frontières, Operational Center Amsterdam, Yangon, Myanmar.
Theingy AyeMédecins Sans Frontières, Operational Center Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jane GreigMédecins Sans Frontières, Operational Center Amsterdam, UK, London.
Thin Thin ThweMédecins Sans Frontières, Operational Center Amsterdam, Yangon, Myanmar.
Laura Moretó-PlanasMédecins Sans Frontières, Operational Center Amsterdam, Yangon, Myanmar.
Jarmila KliesckovaMédecins Sans Frontières, Operational Center Amsterdam, Yangon, Myanmar.
Khin KhinMédecins Sans Frontières, Operational Center Amsterdam, Yangon, Myanmar.
Nana ZarkuaMédecins Sans Frontières, Operational Center Amsterdam, Yangon, Myanmar.
Lucia GonzalezMédecins Sans Frontières, Operational Center Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Erwin Lloyd GuillerganMédecins Sans Frontières, Operational Center Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Daniel P O'BrienMédecins Sans Frontières, Operational Center Amsterdam, UK, London.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionNational AIDS Programme in Myanmar has made significant progress in scaling up antiretroviral treatment (ART) services and recognizes the importance of differentiated care for people living with HIV. Indeed, long centred around the hospital and reliant on physicians, the country's HIV response is undergoing a process of successful decentralization with HIV care increasingly being integrated into other health services as part of a systematic effort to expand access to HIV treatment. This study describes implementation of differentiated care in Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF)-supported programmes and reports its outcomes.

methodsA descriptive cohort analysis of adult patients on antiretroviral treatment was performed. We assessed stability of patients as of 31 December 2014 and introduced an intervention of reduced frequency of physicians' consultations for stable patients, and fast tract ART refills. We measured a number of saved physician's visits as the result of this intervention. Main outcomes, remained under care, death, lost to follow up, treatment failure, were assessed on 31 December 2015 and reported as rates for different stable groups.

resultsOn 31 December 2014, our programme counted 16, 272 adult patients enrolled in HIV care, of whom 80.34% were stable. The model allowed for an increase in the average number of patients one medical team could care for - from 745 patients in 2011 to 1, 627 in 2014 - and, thus, a reduction in the number of teams needed. An assessment of stable patients enrolled on ART one year after the implementation of the new model revealed excellent outcomes, aggregated for stable patients as 98.7% remaining in care, 0.4% dead, 0.8% lost to follow-up, 0.8% clinical treatment failure and 5.8% with immunological treatment failure.

conclusionsImplementation of a differentiated model reduced the number of visits between stable clients and physicians, reduced the medical resources required for treatment and enabled integrated treatment of the main co-morbidities. We hope that these findings will encourage other stakeholders to implement innovative models of HIV care in Myanmar, further expediting the scale up of ART services, the decentralization of treatment and the integration of care for the main HIV co-morbidities in this context.

Indexed as

AdultAnti-HIV AgentsCohort StudiesEpidemicsFemaleHealth ResourcesHealth ServicesHIV InfectionsHumansLost to Follow-UpMaleMyanmarTreatment FailureAnti-HIV Agentsdifferentiated careHIVintegrationMyanmartask shifting

Identifiers

PMID28770589
PMCPMC5577713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.