Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28770516›Full record

ReviewHepatology international2018

Hepatic encephalopathy: a critical current review.

Anna Hadjihambi, Natalia Arias, Mohammed Sheikh, Rajiv Jalan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Hepatology international, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 91 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
91citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

91 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Hepatic Encephalopathy: Current Thoughts on Pathophysiology and Management.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2025
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

31 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anna HadjihambiDivision of Medicine, UCL Medical School, Royal Free Hospital, UCL Institute for Liver and Digestive Health, Rowland Hill Street, London, NW3 2PF, UK.
Natalia AriasDivision of Medicine, UCL Medical School, Royal Free Hospital, UCL Institute for Liver and Digestive Health, Rowland Hill Street, London, NW3 2PF, UK.
Mohammed SheikhDivision of Medicine, UCL Medical School, Royal Free Hospital, UCL Institute for Liver and Digestive Health, Rowland Hill Street, London, NW3 2PF, UK.
Rajiv JalanDivision of Medicine, UCL Medical School, Royal Free Hospital, UCL Institute for Liver and Digestive Health, Rowland Hill Street, London, NW3 2PF, UK. r.jalan@ucl.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) is a serious neuropsychiatric complication of cirrhosis and/or porto-systemic shunting. The clinical symptoms are widely variable, extending from subtle impairment in mental state to coma. The utility of categorizing the severity of HE accurately and efficiently serves not only to provide practical functional information about the current clinical status of the patient but also gives valuable prognostic information. In the past 20-30 years, there has been rapid progress in understanding the pathophysiological basis of HE; however, the lack of direct correlation between pathogenic factors and the severity of HE make it difficult to select appropriate therapy for HE patients. In this review, we will discuss the classification system and its limitations, the neuropsychometric assessments and their challenges, as well as the present knowledge on the pathophysiological mechanisms. Despite the many prevalent hypotheses around the pathogenesis of the disease, most treatments focus on targeting and lowering the accumulation of ammonia as well as inflammation. However, treatment of minimal HE remains a huge unmet need and a big concerted effort is needed to better define this condition to allow the development of new therapies. We review the currently available therapies and future approaches to treat HE as well as the scientific and clinical data that support their effectiveness.

Indexed as

AlbuminsAmmoniaAnti-Bacterial AgentsBile Acids and SaltsBrainBrain EdemaCognitive DysfunctionDipeptidesEnergy MetabolismGastrointestinal AgentsHepatic EncephalopathyHumansLactuloseLiver CirrhosisOrnithinePortasystemic Shunt, SurgicalAlbuminsAmmoniaAnti-Bacterial AgentsBile Acids and SaltsDipeptidesGastrointestinal AgentsLactuloseOrnithineornithine phenylacetateornithylaspartateClassificationHepatic encephalopathyPathogenesisTreatment

Identifiers

PMID28770516
PMCPMC5830466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.