Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28770367›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of microbiology & biotechnology2017

Carbon catabolite regulation in Streptomyces: new insights and lessons learned.

Alba Romero-Rodríguez, Diana Rocha, Beatriz Ruiz-Villafán, Silvia Guzmán-Trampe, Nidia Maldonado-Carmona, Melissa Vázquez-Hernández, Augusto Zelarayán, Romina Rodríguez-Sanoja, Sergio Sánchez

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of microbiology & biotechnology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Current Approaches for Genetic Manipulation ofBiotech (Basel (Switzerland)) · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alba Romero-RodríguezInstituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Tercer Circuito Exterior de Ciudad Universitaria, Mexico City, 04510, Mexico.
Diana RochaInstituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Tercer Circuito Exterior de Ciudad Universitaria, Mexico City, 04510, Mexico.
Beatriz Ruiz-VillafánInstituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Tercer Circuito Exterior de Ciudad Universitaria, Mexico City, 04510, Mexico.
Silvia Guzmán-TrampeInstituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Tercer Circuito Exterior de Ciudad Universitaria, Mexico City, 04510, Mexico.
Nidia Maldonado-CarmonaInstituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Tercer Circuito Exterior de Ciudad Universitaria, Mexico City, 04510, Mexico.
Melissa Vázquez-HernándezInstituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Tercer Circuito Exterior de Ciudad Universitaria, Mexico City, 04510, Mexico.
Augusto ZelarayánInstituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Tercer Circuito Exterior de Ciudad Universitaria, Mexico City, 04510, Mexico.
Romina Rodríguez-SanojaInstituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Tercer Circuito Exterior de Ciudad Universitaria, Mexico City, 04510, Mexico.
Sergio SánchezInstituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Tercer Circuito Exterior de Ciudad Universitaria, Mexico City, 04510, Mexico. sersan@biomedicas.unam.mx.
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the most significant control mechanisms of the physiological processes in the genus Streptomyces is carbon catabolite repression (CCR). This mechanism controls the expression of genes involved in the uptake and utilization of alternative carbon sources in Streptomyces and is mostly independent of the phosphoenolpyruvate phosphotransferase system (PTS). CCR also affects morphological differentiation and the synthesis of secondary metabolites, although not all secondary metabolite genes are equally sensitive to the control by the carbon source. Even when the outcome effect of CCR in bacteria is the same, their essential mechanisms can be rather different. Although usually, glucose elicits this phenomenon, other rapidly metabolized carbon sources can also cause CCR. Multiple efforts have been put through to the understanding of the mechanism of CCR in this genus. However, a reasonable mechanism to explain the nature of this process in Streptomyces does not yet exist. Several examples of primary and secondary metabolites subject to CCR will be examined in this review. Additionally, recent advances in the metabolites and protein factors involved in the Streptomyces CCR, as well as their mechanisms will be described and discussed in this review.

Indexed as

Bacterial ProteinsCarbonCatabolite RepressionGene Expression Regulation, BacterialGlucoseSecondary MetabolismStreptomycesBacterial ProteinsCarbonGlucoseGene expressionMorphological differentiationRegulatory mechanismsRepressionSecondary metabolitesStreptomyces

Identifiers

PMID28770367
OpenAlexW2740403323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.