Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28770349›Full record

SynthesisArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2017

Prevalence of posttraumatic arthritis and the association with outcome measures following distal radius fractures in non-osteoporotic patients: a systematic review.

C M Lameijer, H J Ten Duis, I van Dusseldorp, P U Dijkstra, C K van der Sluis

Erratum issuedAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

C M LameijerDepartment of Trauma Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 30.001, Huispostcode BA51, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands. C.M.Lameijer@UMCG.nl.
H J Ten DuisDepartment of Trauma Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 30.001, Huispostcode BA51, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands.
I van DusseldorpMedical Center Leeuwarden, MCL Academy, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands.
P U DijkstraDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
C K van der SluisDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe objective of this systematic review was to analyze (1) prevalence of radiological posttraumatic arthritis (PA), (2) associations of PA with outcome measures and (3) predictors of PA following distal radius fractures in non-osteoporotic patients. MATERIALS AND

methodsNineteen studies were included (10 open source data).

resultsIn total, 733 patients were described with a weighted mean age of 37 years (range 25-54) at the time of the injury. Follow-up ranged from 13 months to 38 years. Overall prevalence of PA was 50% and 37% in the open source data. Radial deviation was significantly worse in patients with PA (N = 49, mean 14°, SD 6° versus N = 55, mean 17°, SD 6°, p = 0.037). No analysis could be performed regarding patient reported outcome measures, because of limited data. Articular incongruence was a significant predictor for PA.

conclusionsA high prevalence of PA was found in non-osteoporotic patients following a distal radius fracture. PA following a distal radial fracture was associated with a limited radial deviation and flexion, but not with grip strength. Articular incongruence predicted PA. Patient reported outcome measures should be investigated more thoroughly to be able to understand the value of using these instruments in interpreting outcome in follow-up of non-osteoporotic patients following a distal radius fracture. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level of evidence 3 (Phillips et al. Levels of Evidence-Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine, 1).

Indexed as

ArthritisRadius FracturesAdultHumansMiddle AgedPrevalenceRange of Motion, ArticularTreatment OutcomeDistal radiusOutcome measuresPosttraumatic arthritisWrist

Identifiers

PMID28770349
PMCPMC5644687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.