ReviewCilia2017
The rise and fall of basal bodies in the nematode
Review in Cilia, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dendrite morphogenesis in Caenorhabditis elegans.Genetics · 2024Review
- The ARPKD Protein DZIP1L Regulates Ciliary Protein Entry by Modulating the Architecture and Function of Ciliary Transition Fibers.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024Article
- A spatiotemporally resolved atlas of mRNA decay in thebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- The Tubulin Superfamily in Apicomplexan Parasites.Microorganisms · 2023Article
- Review
- Twitchy, the Drosophila orthologue of the ciliary gating protein FBF1/dyf-19, is required for coordinated locomotion and male fertility.Biology open · 2021Article
- Sensory cilia as the Achilles heel of nematodes when attacked by carnivorous mushrooms.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020Article
- The unity and diversity of the ciliary central apparatus.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The free-living nematode,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.