ArticleMobile DNA2017
Discovery of rare, diagnostic
Article in Mobile DNA, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sperm mitochondrial DNA copy number: a marker of male fertility and reproductive success.Human reproduction update · 2026Review
- Long-Read Haplotype Phasing Resolves Allelic Configuration as a Missing Layer of Precision Oncology.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- AnNAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Blood mitochondrial DNA copy number: What are we counting?Mitochondrion · 2021Review
- A comprehensive analysis of chimpanzee (Pan Troglodytes)-specific AluYb8 element.Genes & genomics · 2020Article
- The Simons Genome Diversity Project: A Global Analysis of Mobile Element Diversity.Genome biology and evolution · 2020Article
- Contribution of unfixed transposable element insertions to human regulatory variation.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020Article
- Pedigree-based estimation of human mobile element retrotransposition rates.Genome research · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPolymorphic human
resultsWe identified 5,288 putative
conclusionCurrent
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.