Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28769114›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Rheumatology2017

Diagnosing antiphospholipid syndrome: 'extra-criteria' manifestations and technical advances.

Savino Sciascia, Mary-Carmen Amigo, Dario Roccatello, Munther Khamashta

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Rheumatology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 93 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
93citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

93 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Association of EndometrialBiomedicines · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Antiphospholipid Syndrome and the Kidney.Kidney international reports · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

33 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Savino SciasciaCentre of Research of Immunopathology and Rare Diseases (CMID), Coordinating Centre of Piedmont and Aosta Valley Network for Rare Diseases, Department of Clinical and Biological Sciences, St Giovanni Bosco Hospital and the University of Turin, Piazza del Donatore di Sangue 3, 10154 Turin, Italy.
Mary-Carmen AmigoService of Rheumatology, ABC Medical Center, Sur 136 No. 116, Colonia Las Américas, Mexico City 01220, Mexico.
Dario RoccatelloCentre of Research of Immunopathology and Rare Diseases (CMID), Coordinating Centre of Piedmont and Aosta Valley Network for Rare Diseases, Department of Clinical and Biological Sciences, St Giovanni Bosco Hospital and the University of Turin, Piazza del Donatore di Sangue 3, 10154 Turin, Italy.
Munther KhamashtaDepartment of Rheumatology, Dubai Hospital, PO box 7272, Dubai, UAE.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

First described in the early 1980s, antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a unique form of acquired autoimmune thrombophilia in which patients present with clinical features of recurrent thrombosis and pregnancy morbidity and persistently test positive for the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). At least one clinical (vascular thrombosis or pregnancy morbidity) and one lab-based (positive test result for lupus anticoagulant, anticardiolipin antibodies and/or anti-β2-glycoprotein 1 antibodies) criterion have to be met for a patient to be classified as having APS. However, the clinical spectrum of APS encompasses additional manifestations that can affect many organs and cannot be explained exclusively by patients being in a prothrombotic state; clinical manifestations not listed in the classification criteria (known as extra-criteria manifestations) include neurologic manifestations (chorea, myelitis and migraine), haematologic manifestations (thrombocytopenia and haemolytic anaemia), livedo reticularis, nephropathy and valvular heart disease. Increasingly, research interest has focused on the development of novel assays that might be more specific for APS than the current aPL tests. This Review focuses on the current classification criteria for APS, presenting the role of extra-criteria manifestations and lab-based tests. Diagnostic approaches to difficult cases, including so-called seronegative APS, are also discussed.

Indexed as

Antibodies, AntiphospholipidAntiphospholipid SyndromeDiagnostic Tests, RoutineFemaleHumansMaleNeeds AssessmentSensitivity and SpecificitySeverity of Illness IndexAntibodies, Antiphospholipid

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.